hivemind-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: comments / questions on hivemind 2.0 branch
Date Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:37:38 GMT
I'm going to have to think about that a bit.  I only glanced at the
new stuff for about a half hour this morning so far.  I plan to do a
deeper dive, though.  Here's an interesting question though.  How
about allowing service points to have more than one service interface?



On 11/7/06, Achim Hügen <achim.huegen@gmx.de> wrote:
> James Carman schrieb:
> > I started looking through the new API today and so far it looks pretty
> > cool.  One thing I don't like, though, is having the ClassResolver
> > stuff inside the definition classes.  Is that absolutely necessary?  I
> > was kind of hoping that we could use something like commons proxy to
> > do all of the proxying logic and get ourselves out of the Javassist
> > business if we can.
> The ModuleImpl needs a class provider for the resolveType method.
> It is provided by the ModuleDefinition.
> I think this has the same justification as the ClassResolver mechanism
> itself.
> Do you see another way?
>
> Achim
>
>

Mime
View raw message