hivemind-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Achim Hügen <>
Subject Re: comments / questions on hivemind 2.0 branch
Date Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:33:41 GMT
James Carman schrieb:
> I started looking through the new API today and so far it looks pretty
> cool.  One thing I don't like, though, is having the ClassResolver
> stuff inside the definition classes.  Is that absolutely necessary?  I
> was kind of hoping that we could use something like commons proxy to
> do all of the proxying logic and get ourselves out of the Javassist
> business if we can.
The ModuleImpl needs a class provider for the resolveType method.
It is provided by the ModuleDefinition.
I think this has the same justification as the ClassResolver mechanism 
Do you see another way?


View raw message