Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02BB200C0C for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:24:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BEAEF160B4D; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1450F160B41 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:24:11 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 18410 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2017 11:24:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hive.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hive.apache.org Received: (qmail 18400 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2017 11:24:10 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:24:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 591D01800B9 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:24:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.398 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bYNfwq-kmHnB for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com (mail-qk0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2F42E5F1C2 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id s140so125535377qke.0 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:24:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XQt0dgTb/T+C16L0cSJjbq1Nt8w4llm1FDwxIlXhNK4=; b=mtfAkmszGW142EWYU0kqVtCSiOWt+bHlsk/JduA4UORBoR+7234P2pvVvc1hhRbi+6 1EeUl7hxp/QPLlDr0pvbcNGwp19PgBXOVV9eXN1YRerA0ZDg/EoEynkErX/oZpODetRr sV9bmuUXKS4zjEXZNj7DD3EcTnTUzkysYHCj1Q+n3bT1NoXKsOUKGHCrbkdCI+owDfGj 3PKiNja3tNbNxA6ShsUVZuvMW0d+p5U6tRkEo7MIWUi5qdkVTtZxwXqqrNdKT7pAhV1T 7Y1HVngdtCEAZLdJ9ImTZK69BtCeakZMZOLdKqxsG4Jz0P1r7mp36ZX5XOUKkXNR918W JTPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=XQt0dgTb/T+C16L0cSJjbq1Nt8w4llm1FDwxIlXhNK4=; b=EI+6RDfmqRxp5Z3ONAnfzVMsLG25+x27hpIirllxJLotH2qu68LJ2FOh/bLAsdlROd cGDDgXM5XO++x1mRasv8LERtAE3A0JcwtOdGXsXtttTPsUaXhVTqCJlmKxQ3sYXuRoj+ E4Oe2YDBDYnCcUYobH+X2Znxt98UwAF69XDwvLDP6Q6JVzI00FM9LKoEfo5BMbpRdXfE UJ6XU1LWGY7/aAgPEZwY2QnlJl3T+1tgDdKk3yh3LyL+eZDnlP5a/W9jjqC6L7GmZzg7 Xm+V/WQURlM9+8kLQtc4NWbHt33BPTcePa98IQPkb6UFtZ9ZSdZeeBGWCkp+biaE4T+h a1TA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIIsiz7yZ8xkJvnTob2S5M7FBOSPT3aTvV1yBGTGvIm2DcjW2+kqzpPj8EX9s6XXh/+Rl5QbobygZnZaQ== X-Received: by 10.55.99.80 with SMTP id x77mr7626119qkb.147.1485775445510; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:24:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.36.196 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:24:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: goun na Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:24:04 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Experimental results using TPC-DS (versus Spark and Presto) To: user@hive.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0b8454a54fff05474e0d2f archived-at: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:24:12 -0000 --94eb2c0b8454a54fff05474e0d2f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for sharing benchmark results. May I ask why you choose ORC? 2017-01-30 19:57 GMT+09:00 =EA=B9=80=EB=8F=99=EC=9B=90 : > Hi, > > Recently I did some experiments using Hive, Spark, and Presto using TPC-D= S > benchmark > and I'd like to share the result with the community: http://www. > slideshare.net/ssuser6bb12d/hive-presto-and-spark-on-tpcds-benchmark > I entirely depend on the benchmark kit from Hortonwork: > https://github.com/hortonworks/hive-testbench > > Here I have a question about query 72. > Hive LLAP shows better performance than Presto and Spark for most queries= , > but it shows very poor performance on the execution of query 72. > While Presto also struggles with query 72, Spark finishes the execution o= f > query 72 a lot faster than Hive (page 9 and 10). > I've observed a weird pattern in CPU utilization from Presto and Hive > executing query 72 (page 11). > When I turned off Spark's WholeStageCodeGen, Spark also takes a very long > time to finish the execution of query 72 (page 12). > Did I miss some feature of Hive to improve the performance of that kind o= f > query? > I use the following setting for Hive experiments: https://github. > com/hortonworks/hive-testbench/blob/hive14/sample-queries-tpcds/testbench= . > settings > > Except query 72, Hive with LLAP shows very good performance for both smal= l > and large workload anyway. > > - Dongwon Kim > --94eb2c0b8454a54fff05474e0d2f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for sharing benchmark results. May I ask why you ch= oose ORC?

--94eb2c0b8454a54fff05474e0d2f--