Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hive-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hive-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC114E286 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27246 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2013 08:02:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hive-user-archive@hive.apache.org Received: (qmail 26933 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2013 08:02:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hive.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hive.apache.org Received: (qmail 26885 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2013 08:02:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:02:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.44] (HELO mail-oa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.219.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:02:02 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id h1so348898oag.31 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:01:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=O3vAiAV1/3TraA7tusKH+7hcCJQ+XAZJs6IaN0U8DhI=; b=fAaZgtUHf67V/1M8D7hVL6Bs+lyJgDO2kJNqs8ylVYJ/NXJjSycF26C75cx91fWOQW br3H/9AaXrlKd5Q8OKAneMCAPGs00qUwvqfwWg4CgJgOEOw4U96XvrV33h/2zTVdBY0+ +7SHJjZQZc55C2QyjwG8UAtBOaDLktTmnc9jUCIMlOqwHkEIHnE6zj0u8kp8ZzWM4/w5 PfQaRsDdaJkpSi63AbnoBZ90rQTb/CiyARKdz4hlUB+cHgqYTgdcwIfwLTexz2jEIIXS FMG7MTpvbyGc3Os+ui4KF3wKPCX8eE808MhVQtoUkDXa++BK0rJap4NdWp5DEo3txoM+ +Bfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.27.228 with SMTP id w4mr386076oeg.104.1361520100449; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:01:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.162.40 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:01:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:01:40 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: unbalanced transaction calls From: =?EUC-KR?B?TmF2aXO3+b3Cv+w=?= To: user@hive.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnIRqO7b+P8JZntNjf83eugqvx2ovzgHSn7FTPWsctpITv514UrJWoiGLflCtowG9zIuMRd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Could you try to make transaction related methods synchronized? It's openTransaction/commitTransaction/isActiveTransaction/rollbackTransaction on ObjectStore.java 2013/2/22 Hemanth Yamijala : > Hi, > > We are running into the same problem as well. Is there any clue what could > be wrong ? > > Thanks > hemanth > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:51 AM, James Warren > wrote: >> >> As part of our daily workflow, we're running a few hundred hive >> queries that are coordinated through oozie. Recently we're >> encountering issues where on average a job or two fails - and never >> the same query. The observed error is: >> >> FAILED: Error in metadata: java.lang.RuntimeException: >> commitTransaction was called but openTransactionCalls = 0. This >> probably indicates that there are unbalanced calls to >> openTransaction/commitTransaction >> >> which I've seen was referred to in HIVE-1760 but patched in 0.7. >> >> We're running Hive 0.9 (from CDH 4.1 - will redirect to the Cloudera >> lists if that is a more appropriate form) - any ideas / suggestions >> where I should start looking? >> >> cheers, >> -James > >