hive-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Assigned] (HIVE-17674) grep TODO HIVE-15212.17.patch |wc - l = 49
Date Tue, 03 Oct 2017 19:49:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Sergey Shelukhin reassigned HIVE-17674:
---------------------------------------

    Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin

> grep TODO HIVE-15212.17.patch |wc - l = 49
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-17674
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17674
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Transactions
>            Reporter: Eugene Koifman
>            Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
>
> grep TODO HIVE-15212.17.patch 
> +  // TODO The following two utility methods can be moved to AcidUtils once no class
in metastore is relying on them,
> +  // TODO: CTAS for MM may currently be broken. It used to work. See the old code and
why isCtas isn't used?
> +    // TODO: Setting these separately is a very hairy issue in certain combinations,
since we
> +    // TODO: this doesn't handle list bucketing properly. Does the original exim do
that?
> +      // TODO: support this? we only bail because it's a PITA and hardly anyone seems
to care.
> +    // TODO: support this?
> +    // TODO: support this?
> +          // TODO: why is it stored in both?
> +      // TODO: this doesn't work... the path for writer and reader mismatch
> -            // TODO: In a follow-up to HIVE-1361, we should refactor loadDynamicPartitions
> +    // TODO: In a follow-up to HIVE-1361, we should refactor loadDynamicPartitions
> +      // TODO: this particular bit will not work for MM tables, as there can be multiple
> +        // TODO: not clear why two if conditions are different. Preserve the existing
logic for now.
> +      // TODO: not clear why two if conditions are different. Preserve the existing
logic for now.
> +  // TODO: not clear why two if conditions are different. Preserve the existing logic
for now.
> +  // TODO: not clear why two if conditions are different. Preserve the existing logic
for now.
> +      // TODO: do we also need to do this when creating an empty partition from select?
> +    // TODO: see HIVE-14886 - removeTempOrDuplicateFiles is broken for list bucketing,
> +          // TODO: for IOW, we also need to count in base dir, if any
> +      // TODO: HiveFileFormatUtils.getPartitionDescFromPathRecursively for MM tables?
> +        // TODO: not having aliases for path usually means some bug. Should it give
up?
>      updateMrWork(jobConf);  // TODO: refactor this in HIVE-6366
> +      // TODO: this assumes both paths are qualified; which they are, currently.
> +    // TODO: just like the move path, we only do one level of recursion.
> +  // TODO: may be broken? no LB bugs for now but if any are found.
> +  String lbDirSuffix = lbDirName.replace(partDirName, ""); // TODO: wtf?
> +        // TODO: we should really probably throw. Keep the existing logic for now.
> +    // TODO: this assumes both paths are qualified; which they are, currently.
> +        // TODO: we assume lbLevels is 0 here. Same as old code for non-MM.
> +          // TODO: we could just find directories with any MM directories inside?
>    // TODO: add test case and clean it up
> +  // Duplicates logic in TextMetaDataFormatter TODO: wtf?!!
> +  // TODO: why is this in text formatter? grrr
> +      // TODO# noop MoveWork to avoid q file changes in HIVE-14990. Remove (w/the flag)
after merge.
> +    // TODO: this should never happen for mm tables.
> +    // TODO: if we are not dealing with concatenate DDL, we should not create a merge+move
path
> +    // TODO: wtf? wtf?!! why is this in this method?
> +    // TODO: this relies a lot on having one file per bucket. No support for MM tables
for now.
> +        // TODO: should this use getPartitionDescFromPathRecursively?
> +      // TODO: we should probably block all ACID tables here.
> +              @SuppressWarnings("unused") // TODO: wtf?
> +    // TODO: due to the master merge, tblDesc is no longer CreateTableDesc, but ImportTableDesc
> +        // TODO: ReplCopyTask is completely screwed. Need to support when it's not as
screwed.
> +          // TODO: ReplCopyTask is completely screwed. Need to support when it's not
as screwed.
>    // TODO: the below seems like they should just be combined into partitionDesc
> +    // TODO: could we instead get FS from path here and add normal files for every UGI?
> +-- TODO: doesn't work truncate table part_mm partition(key_mm=455);
> +-- TODO: need to include merge+union+DP, but it's broken for now
> +  // TODO: move these test parameters to more specific places... there's no need to
have them here



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message