hive-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "liyunzhang_intel (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (HIVE-16600) Refactor SetSparkReducerParallelism#needSetParallelism to enable parallel order by in multi_insert cases
Date Wed, 07 Jun 2017 07:56:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16040438#comment-16040438
] 

liyunzhang_intel edited comment on HIVE-16600 at 6/7/17 7:56 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[~lirui]: v1 patch( with tranversing to the final FS) can not deal with the following case
{code}

RS -SEL- LIMIT. - FS
         -  FS
{code}
this is a multi-insert but should enable parallel order by because LIMIT is in multi-insert
 query.  
If my understanding is wrong, please tell me, besides, is there any wrong with algorithms
in v10 patch although it is complex?


was (Author: kellyzly):
[~lirui]: v1 patch( with tranversing to the final FS) can not deal with the following case
{code}

RS - LIMIT. - FS
       -  FS
{code}
this is a multi-insert but should enable parallel order by because LIMIT is in multi-insert
 query.  
If my understanding is wrong, please tell me, besides, is there any wrong with algorithms
in v10 patch although it is complex?

> Refactor SetSparkReducerParallelism#needSetParallelism to enable parallel order by in
multi_insert cases
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-16600
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16600
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: liyunzhang_intel
>            Assignee: liyunzhang_intel
>         Attachments: HIVE-16600.10.patch, HIVE-16600.1.patch, HIVE-16600.2.patch, HIVE-16600.3.patch,
HIVE-16600.4.patch, HIVE-16600.5.patch, HIVE-16600.6.patch, HIVE-16600.7.patch, HIVE-16600.8.patch,
HIVE-16600.9.patch, mr.explain, mr.explain.log.HIVE-16600, Node.java, TestSetSparkReduceParallelism_MultiInsertCase.java
>
>
> multi_insert_gby.case.q
> {code}
> set hive.exec.reducers.bytes.per.reducer=256;
> set hive.optimize.sampling.orderby=true;
> drop table if exists e1;
> drop table if exists e2;
> create table e1 (key string, value string);
> create table e2 (key string);
> FROM (select key, cast(key as double) as keyD, value from src order by key) a
> INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE e1
>     SELECT key, value
> INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE e2
>     SELECT key;
> select * from e1;
> select * from e2;
> {code} 
> the parallelism of Sort is 1 even we enable parallel order by("hive.optimize.sampling.orderby"
is set as "true").  This is not reasonable because the parallelism  should be calcuated by
 [Utilities.estimateReducers|https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/spark/SetSparkReducerParallelism.java#L170]
> this is because SetSparkReducerParallelism#needSetParallelism returns false when [children
size of RS|https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/spark/SetSparkReducerParallelism.java#L207]
is greater than 1.
> in this case, the children size of {{RS[2]}} is two.
> the logical plan of the case
> {code}
>    TS[0]-SEL[1]-RS[2]-SEL[3]-SEL[4]-FS[5]
>                             -SEL[6]-FS[7]
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message