Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F369200CF3 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:05:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 4DEBF1609CA; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 945491609C9 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:05:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 68457 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2017 13:05:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hive.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hive.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@hive.apache.org Received: (qmail 29653 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2017 11:25:07 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Hai7JYEd0qpucg7qzPD6QS76kuDGzmr+dvpIIVwSzgg=; b=fwP1hHG+AxwsxXEdA6Mnz1lmDQ0SvU7xDrJfHXx/p2gIPDiWpeHaqviuI4DQ97tdxF eVIHXnPemYKmITLPv8Lw6wP8kPZFJD54LFhZLdF4y+IKRoRKq+iA48aR6czPmnIG/XRD hb/xE16yvF1kDsb95VAxoc8GyzlxsTRl6/QBFc6msLk3OWyo857DY1YkDZ8lCJSP6no7 xovEpnTmycjy+UZjJHDgyy4euSJfu1CuCkObZLgvYvuGenCZUH4XodropsIYHxUq2ySx Fq0uWaSfzIKT4Wf8y6msy9KuFcDn+oa9AqCaLVfN0t2IudQt6/S5POO4302xgfHZLArq HcYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Hai7JYEd0qpucg7qzPD6QS76kuDGzmr+dvpIIVwSzgg=; b=g3/sD6TsCNfhRLbB+DNNXb1kRExUaj48iDbH9UdsDouH0QNdpgwgOm7IRh+mN9qMdz iHHP8uqz6b+tn9yZylCyDREjyutKquHFjFmzIsYuAv9hqaB1UN7UfgcZ1yrd2Kxs1zkj pHt2m+jeiy5QmRmY19skNpVKO2RZerTDmCWNyMIchGdIDrejbEz7neTG56wWEDN7CFaH 16SQv82oawHhWuXqfiwxLXgGCWUHN96qex0Xus4JqVIoaFRwwpmme/oNRJiWyXRixvfR qL/onwkggENScE5b6zm1p1Gl/oXQxdFFeX/wCJvTNANwrHUNp8gKxh6rK/fpBoy5N5wZ 9J/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUj2O/5flq2K8WEmP9MO7XSmFrR1CazMZaipKCgwaSBqm7CpZJx2 Y+6lpkApX8ubd4pqbzMVR+o0Nvn0JXdIMxbSzxI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4QGJEpA0dFWwDA+vri5rH0fbM9G+EiJs+U+gUrinzfnCyIid/4629yvZTIgqdX0uuJq/eUNnuEiTGGL007Mik= X-Received: by 10.176.82.210 with SMTP id w18mr14170228uaw.29.1505301904064; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 04:25:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cm4gRnJhbmtl?= Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:25:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Hive Custom Inputformat mapred.* vs. mapreduce.* To: dev@hive.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c18faac4584fe05591069ab" archived-at: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:05:10 -0000 --94eb2c18faac4584fe05591069ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear all, I have developed several custom input formats (e.g. for the Bitcoin blockchain) including a HiveSerde, which are open source. I plan to develop for my HadoopOffice inputformat also a HiveSerde, but I wonder if I should continue to use mapred.* apis or if i should use mapreduce.* My inputformats support both APIs, but it seems that Hive is one of the last (please correct me here) to use the mapred.* API Personally, i have no preference, since I support both. Thank you. All the best --94eb2c18faac4584fe05591069ab--