hive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Owen O'Malley" <omal...@apache.org>
Subject [DISCUSS] Release tags
Date Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:09:55 GMT
On a related note, we should discuss whether it makes sense to remove the
rc tags once the vote closes. I think it reduces confusion. What do others
think?

.. Owen

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Owen O'Malley <omalley@apache.org> wrote:

> According to Apache Infra, we should be creating our release tags in the
> rel/* space. Tags with names that start with "rel/" can never be changed
> once they are pushed to Apache, so be careful. *smile*  But having a
> unmodifiable tag is good to make sure that no one is tempted to "fix" a
> release.
>
> Can you please recreate the tag with the name "rel/release-2.1.0". I'd
> also suggest that you sign the tag with your GPG key with "git tag -s
> rel/release-2.1.0 <commit=id>"
>
> Thanks,
>    Owen
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
> jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
>> their comments and votes.
>>
>> The tally is as follows.
>>
>> 4 +1s:
>> Prasanth Jayachandran
>> Gunther Hagleitner
>> Sushanth Sowmyan
>> Jason Dere
>>
>> No 0s or -1s.
>>
>> Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release
>> Apache Hive 2.1.0 has passed! We'll now roll the release out to the
>> mirrors.
>>
>> In addition, I have created HIVE-14059 to fix the issue with the
>> missing headers for the 2 files (thanks for catching that one
>> Sushanth).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/17/16, 3:54 PM, "Jason Dere" <jdere@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Checked signatures, ran build and a few tests.
>> >+1
>> >________________________________________
>> >From: Sushanth Sowmyan <khorgath@gmail.com>
>> >Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:30 PM
>> >To: dev@hive.apache.org
>> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3
>> >
>> >Actually, to be more explicit, per Thejas' case of the top level
>> >license taking precedence, this RC has my +1.
>> >
>> >On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan <khorgath@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> I will happily rescind my -1 and even convert it to a +1 if the top
>> >> level license does hold. I thought that the RAT check was a necessary
>> >> blocker.
>> >>
>> >> (Although, if the top level license does cover across the board, we
>> >> may want to open a new discussion on whether having a license
>> >> requirement for every source file is necessary in the first place, and
>> >> tweak the definition of the rat check so it does not fail it in this
>> >> case.)
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Thejas Nair <thejas.nair@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> I don't think the missing headers for 2 files mandates a respin of
>> >>> this RC .  It is not really a case of 'incompatible' license or code
>> >>> that shouldn't be shipped.
>> >>> We have a top level license file that covers the entire project,
>> >>> including these files.
>> >>> IMO, We should fix it if there is a new RC for some other reason. But
>> >>> this alone doesn't seem to make new RC necessary.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sushanth, Can you please reconsider your -1 ?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan <khorgath@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> -1, terribly sorry I didn't check for this earlier, but the RAT
check
>> >>>> fails for this.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If you run mvn apache-rat:check , then you see the following issue:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Unapproved licenses:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>  /Users/sush/t/rel/apache-hive-2.1.0-src/common/src/java/org/apache/hive/common/util/DateParser.java
>> >>>>
>>  /Users/sush/t/rel/apache-hive-2.1.0-src/common/src/test/org/apache/hive/common/util/TestDateParser.java
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Basically, these two files are missing the apache license header.
We
>> >>>> need to add them in.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> All other things are good, though. It has the oracle fix I asked
for
>> >>>> in RC2, md5s and signatures check out, compilation works on source
>> >>>> package, and I'm able to run the hive binary from the binary package.
>> >>>> I also tried a number of tests, and I've run a rat test on the
>> release
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>> >>>> <jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 is available here:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jcamacho/hive-2.1.0-rc3
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Maven artifacts are available here:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-1057/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Source tag for RC3 is at:
>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/release-2.1.0-rc3
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Voting will conclude in 72 hours.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hive PMC Members: Please test and vote.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message