hive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <jcamachorodrig...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3
Date Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:40:03 GMT
Yes Thejas, I think it makes sense. It would be good to know if want to remove
the RC tags to update it all together.

Further, I wonder if we should move all the tag releases to rel/*. I can do
that too.

--

Jesús



On 6/21/16, 10:35 AM, "Thejas Nair" <thejas.nair@gmail.com> wrote:

>Jesus,
>Should we update the how-to-release page with steps suggested by Owen ?
>Thanks,
>Thejas
>
>
>On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
><jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for pointing that out Owen, it is done now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/21/16, 7:08 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <omalley@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>According to Apache Infra, we should be creating our release tags in the
>>>rel/* space. Tags with names that start with "rel/" can never be changed
>>>once they are pushed to Apache, so be careful. *smile*  But having a
>>>unmodifiable tag is good to make sure that no one is tempted to "fix" a
>>>release.
>>>
>>>Can you please recreate the tag with the name "rel/release-2.1.0". I'd also
>>>suggest that you sign the tag with your GPG key with "git tag -s
>>>rel/release-2.1.0 <commit=id>"
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>   Owen
>>>
>>>On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
>>>jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
>>>> their comments and votes.
>>>>
>>>> The tally is as follows.
>>>>
>>>> 4 +1s:
>>>> Prasanth Jayachandran
>>>> Gunther Hagleitner
>>>> Sushanth Sowmyan
>>>> Jason Dere
>>>>
>>>> No 0s or -1s.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release
>>>> Apache Hive 2.1.0 has passed! We'll now roll the release out to the
>>>> mirrors.
>>>>
>>>> In addition, I have created HIVE-14059 to fix the issue with the
>>>> missing headers for the 2 files (thanks for catching that one
>>>> Sushanth).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/17/16, 3:54 PM, "Jason Dere" <jdere@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Checked signatures, ran build and a few tests.
>>>> >+1
>>>> >________________________________________
>>>> >From: Sushanth Sowmyan <khorgath@gmail.com>
>>>> >Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:30 PM
>>>> >To: dev@hive.apache.org
>>>> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3
>>>> >
>>>> >Actually, to be more explicit, per Thejas' case of the top level
>>>> >license taking precedence, this RC has my +1.
>>>> >
>>>> >On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan <khorgath@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> I will happily rescind my -1 and even convert it to a +1 if the
top
>>>> >> level license does hold. I thought that the RAT check was a necessary
>>>> >> blocker.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> (Although, if the top level license does cover across the board,
we
>>>> >> may want to open a new discussion on whether having a license
>>>> >> requirement for every source file is necessary in the first place,
and
>>>> >> tweak the definition of the rat check so it does not fail it in
this
>>>> >> case.)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Thejas Nair <thejas.nair@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> I don't think the missing headers for 2 files mandates a respin
of
>>>> >>> this RC .  It is not really a case of 'incompatible' license
or code
>>>> >>> that shouldn't be shipped.
>>>> >>> We have a top level license file that covers the entire project,
>>>> >>> including these files.
>>>> >>> IMO, We should fix it if there is a new RC for some other reason.
But
>>>> >>> this alone doesn't seem to make new RC necessary.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Sushanth, Can you please reconsider your -1 ?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan <khorgath@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>> -1, terribly sorry I didn't check for this earlier, but
the RAT check
>>>> >>>> fails for this.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> If you run mvn apache-rat:check , then you see the following
issue:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>>  /Users/sush/t/rel/apache-hive-2.1.0-src/common/src/java/org/apache/hive/common/util/DateParser.java
>>>> >>>>
>>>>  /Users/sush/t/rel/apache-hive-2.1.0-src/common/src/test/org/apache/hive/common/util/TestDateParser.java
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Basically, these two files are missing the apache license
header. We
>>>> >>>> need to add them in.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> All other things are good, though. It has the oracle fix
I asked for
>>>> >>>> in RC2, md5s and signatures check out, compilation works
on source
>>>> >>>> package, and I'm able to run the hive binary from the binary
package.
>>>> >>>> I also tried a number of tests, and I've run a rat test
on the release
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>>>> >>>> <jcamachorodriguez@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>> Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 is available here:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jcamacho/hive-2.1.0-rc3
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Maven artifacts are available here:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-1057/
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Source tag for RC3 is at:
>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/release-2.1.0-rc3
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Voting will conclude in 72 hours.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Hive PMC Members: Please test and vote.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Thanks.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>
Mime
View raw message