hive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brock Noland <>
Subject Re: 0.15 release
Date Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:41:37 GMT
Hi Alan,

Thank you very much for the clarification. Naming the branch "next" for now
is fine with me. I've done so.


On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Alan Gates <> wrote:

> I'm not asking you to slow the work for the release.  If you want to
> branch, you can branch.  What I'm asking is to hold on the numbering
> scheme.  So you could name the branch 'next' or something and then rename
> once we come to agreement.  Consensus in the community is important, and we
> should avoid things that make that consensus harder.
> Alan.
>   Brock Noland <>
>  January 26, 2015 at 9:17
> Hi Alan,
> In all of my experience at Apache, I have been encouraged to release.
> Contributors rightly want to see their hard work gets in the hands of the
> users. That's why they contribute after all. Many contributors who have
> features in trunk would like get those features out into the community.
> This is completely reasonable of them. After all they've invested
> significant time in this work.
> Thus I don't feel we should delay getting their contributions released
> while we debate 1.0. The two have nothing todo with each other. I've
> mentioned on the list and in person to Thejas that I wanted this release to
> specifically avoid the 1.x discussion so it did not get bogged down in the
> 1.x discussion. Again, this is completely reasonable.
> In short, everything I have experienced at Apache indicates that the folks
> who want to release 0.15 should be free to do the work to make that happen.
> Brock
>   Alan Gates <>
>  January 26, 2015 at 7:02
>  Brock,
> Given there isn't consensus on numbering yet, could you holding off making
> the 0.15 branch.  We should come to a conclusion on whether we're doing
> 0.14.1/0.15 or 1.0/1.1 before assigning anymore numbers.
> Alan.
>   Brock Noland <>
>  January 20, 2015 at 21:25
> Just a reminder that I plan on branching on 1/26/2015 and start
> rolling release candidates on 2/9/2015. After branching I plan on
> merging only blockers.
> Brock
>   Brock Noland <>
>  January 12, 2015 at 14:37
> Hi,
> Projects are instructed in the incubator that releases gain new users and
> other attention. Additionally, as discussed in this forum I'd like to
> increase the tempo of our release process[1].
> As such, I plan on following this process:
> 1) Provide two weeks notice of branching
> 2) Provide two weeks to find issues on the branch and merging only blockers
> 3) Roll release candidates until a release vote passes
> As such I plan on branching on 1/26/2015 and start rolling release
> candidates on 2/9/2015.
> Cheers,
> Brock
> 1. Note I am not complaining as I did not help with releases until this
> point.
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message