hive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin Wilfong (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HIVE-2621) Allow multiple group bys with the same input data and spray keys to be run on the same reducer.
Date Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:24:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13978736#comment-13978736
] 

Kevin Wilfong commented on HIVE-2621:
-------------------------------------

It's been a while, but I the definition you posted looks correct.

> Allow multiple group bys with the same input data and spray keys to be run on the same
reducer.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-2621
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2621
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Kevin Wilfong
>            Assignee: Kevin Wilfong
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>         Attachments: ASF.LICENSE.NOT.GRANTED--HIVE-2621.D567.1.patch, ASF.LICENSE.NOT.GRANTED--HIVE-2621.D567.2.patch,
ASF.LICENSE.NOT.GRANTED--HIVE-2621.D567.3.patch, ASF.LICENSE.NOT.GRANTED--HIVE-2621.D567.4.patch,
HIVE-2621.1.patch.txt
>
>
> Currently, when a user runs a query, such as a multi-insert, where each insertion subclause
consists of a simple query followed by a group by, the group bys for each clause are run on
a separate reducer.  This requires writing the data for each group by clause to an intermediate
file, and then reading it back.  This uses a significant amount of the total CPU consumed
by the query for an otherwise simple query.
> If the subclauses are grouped by their distinct expressions and group by keys, with all
of the group by expressions for a group of subclauses run on a single reducer, this would
reduce the amount of reading/writing to intermediate files for some queries.
> To do this, for each group of subclauses, in the mapper we would execute a the filters
for each subclause 'or'd together (provided each subclause has a filter) followed by a reduce
sink.  In the reducer, the child operators would be each subclauses filter followed by the
group by and any subsequent operations.
> Note that this would require turning off map aggregation, so we would need to make using
this type of plan configurable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message