Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hive-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hive-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE9DB1057A for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 01:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35840 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2013 01:35:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hive-dev-archive@hive.apache.org Received: (qmail 35794 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2013 01:35:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hive.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hive.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hive.apache.org Received: (qmail 35784 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2013 01:35:33 -0000 Received: from reviews-vm.apache.org (HELO reviews.apache.org) (140.211.11.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:35:33 +0000 Received: from reviews.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reviews.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279801D38F6; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 01:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============7252393202159508567==" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Review Request 15217: HIVE-5726: The DecimalTypeInfo instance associated with a decimal constant is not in line with the precision/scale of the constant From: "Brock Noland" To: "Xuefu Zhang" , "hive" , "Brock Noland" Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:35:30 -0000 Message-ID: <20131106013530.30022.54818@reviews.apache.org> X-ReviewBoard-URL: https://reviews.apache.org Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Sender: "Brock Noland" X-ReviewGroup: hive X-ReviewRequest-URL: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15217/ X-Sender: "Brock Noland" References: <20131105193136.30022.83610@reviews.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20131105193136.30022.83610@reviews.apache.org> Reply-To: "Brock Noland" --===============7252393202159508567== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > On Nov. 5, 2013, 7:31 p.m., Brock Noland wrote: > > This looks very good! Why didn't we add a new test to TestHiveDecimal? It looks like this functionality could be tested there. > > Xuefu Zhang wrote: > Were you referring to the change made to HiveDecimal? If so, yes, that can be tested in TestHiveDecimal. However, the main objection of the the patch cannot be tested in TestHiveDecimal, as HiveDecimal represents data only, but type info is about metadata. Sorry I wasn't clear. Yes I am asking why we didn't add new test functionality to TestHiveDecimal for the changes in HiveDecimal. The change looks like it's a good candidate for a unit test to ensure we don't regress. - Brock ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15217/#review28202 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 4, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Xuefu Zhang wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/15217/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 4, 2013, 11:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for hive. > > > Bugs: HIVE-5726 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-5726 > > > Repository: hive-git > > > Description > ------- > > With this patch, the resuting schema from constant is in accordance with the constant instead of the default from the type. > > > Diffs > ----- > > common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/common/type/HiveDecimal.java 606f6d4 > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/TypeCheckProcFactory.java 47d7995 > ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/ctas_hadoop20.q 4961b97 > ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/ctas_hadoop20.q.out 885e985 > ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/literal_decimal.q.out 2d1ae55 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15217/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > New tests are added. Test suite passed. > > > Thanks, > > Xuefu Zhang > > --===============7252393202159508567==--