Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hive.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hive.apache.org
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:16:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12666393.1377896163507.12905.1380064565684@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12666393.1377896163507@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12666393.1377896163507@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HIVE-5190) partition retrieval via JDO is
 inconsistent between by-name and by-filter method
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-5190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13776902#comment-13776902 ] 

Sergey Shelukhin commented on HIVE-5190:
----------------------------------------

[~ashutoshc] you are asking me about this often, you should watch this jira :)

                
> partition retrieval via JDO is inconsistent between by-name and by-filter method
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-5190
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-5190
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Metastore
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When we get partitions by name, we call retrieveAll, forcing the retrieval of all fields of the partition. Retrieving by filter has:
> {code}
>  // pm.retrieveAll(mparts); // retrieveAll is pessimistic. some fields may not be needed
> {code}
> The code moved around recently but it was there for a while. This may cause inconsistent results from two methods in terms of what fields are set.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira