hive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Chu <e...@rocketfuel.com>
Subject Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Date Mon, 26 Aug 2013 21:57:55 GMT
Hi,

We recently tried to upgrade to Hive 0.11 from 0.10 and noticed we needed
to add patches for the following JIRAs to make Hive 0.11 work:

   - HIVE-4619. None of our MR queries worked without it
   - HIVE-4003. We ran into this bug in 0.10 also
   - Data Nucleus-related: At first we were only trying to get rid of the
   Data Nucleus error messages, but one Jira led to another, and we ended up
   upgrading Data Nucleus with the following:
      - HIVE-4900, HIVE-3632, HIVE-4942 (and then do ant very-clean to
      clean up old version of Data Nucleus)
   - HIVE-4647

On a separate note:

   - HIVE-5149. This bug made us revert to Hive-0.10 b/c at the time we
   didn't know what's wrong. See email titled "DISTRIBUTE BY works incorrectly
   in Hive 0.11 in some cases", which led to the creation of HIVE-5149. The
   proposed workaround works but as we noted there we still need the right
   fix. The property hive.optimize.reducededuplication already existed in
   Hive 0.10 so this is a regression.

Thanks,

Eric


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Owen O'Malley <omalley@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>    I haven't made any progress on it yet. I hope to make progress on it
> this week. I will certainly include the npath changes. On a separate
> thread, I'll start a discussion about starting to lock down 0.12.0.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Mark Grover <mark@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > Any update on this? We are considering including Hive 0.11* in Bigtop 0.7
> > and it would be very useful and much appreciated to get a little more
> > context into what the Hive 0.11.1 release would look like.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I am fealing more like we should release a 12.0 rather then backport
> > things
> > > into 11.X.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Navis류승우 <navis.ryu@nexr.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > > If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for
> > > that.
> > > >
> > > > Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0?
> > > >
> > > > ps. IMHO, n-path seemed too generic name to be patented. I hate
> > Teradata.
> > > >
> > > > 2013/8/14 Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If
> > not I
> > > > > will take it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner <
> > wagner.mark.d@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953
> has
> > > been
> > > > >> committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> Mark
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <
> omalley@apache.org
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > All,
> > > > >> >    I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I
plan to
> > put
> > > > >> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in
the
> > process
> > > of
> > > > >> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include,
but I
> > > > wanted to
> > > > >> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important
for an
> > > 0.11.1.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> >    Owen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message