Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hive.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hive.apache.org
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:22:34 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Navis (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <1194724369.57134.1342434154442.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm>
In-Reply-To: <1579589844.56704.1342422154889.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HIVE-3260) support bucketed mapjoin where the
 small table has different number of buckets for different partitons
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13414980#comment-13414980 ] 

Navis commented on HIVE-3260:
-----------------------------

It is right thing which should be done. 

But why not support buckets per partition? Would it be enough to change the code above to 
{code}
int bucketNum = sd.getNumBuckets();
return bucketNum < 0 ? table.getNumBuckets() : bucketNum;
{code}
and add some DDL syntax for partition?
                
> support bucketed mapjoin where the small table has different number of buckets for different partitons
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-3260
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3260
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Namit Jain
>
> Consider the following scenario:
> A (1 partition) join B (2 partitions)
> A has 2 buckets, whereas B has 2 and 4 buckets for different partitions.
> The bucketed mapjoin should still work.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira