Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hive.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hive.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 98.139.253.105 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of thw@yahoo-inc.com)
From: Thomas Weise <thw@yahoo-inc.com>
To: "dev@hive.apache.org" <dev@hive.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 19:02:53 -0700
Subject: Re: Hive 0.9 release
Thread-Topic: Hive 0.9 release
Thread-Index: Ac0RPYy4PsEDwkHqTcW2rb65Xh+11gAAFRX/
Message-ID: <CB9FA85D.6FB7%thw@yahoo-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+FBdFQfjb17Ak_uH7jooHSwrAwKz5r--_86y-tH8PQ799SknQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.10.0.110428
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Would be great to get HIVE-2646 included.

Thanks,
Thomas


On 4/2/12 6:59 PM, "Ashutosh Chauhan" <hashutosh@apache.org> wrote:

> Here is a list of jiras which I plan to get in 0.9.
>=20
> HIVE-2084
> HIVE-2822
> HIVE-2764
> HIVE-538
>=20
> I will work with authors of these patches to see these can get in. Others=
,
> please feel free to add this list.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>=20
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 18:39, Carl Steinbach <carl@cloudera.com> wrote:
>=20
>> I'm +1 on doing an 0.9.0 release, but would also like to suggest that we
>> put together a list of 0.9.0 blockers before cutting the release branch.=
 In
>> the past we have frequently underestimated the amount of work required t=
o
>> get trunk into a releasable state, with the consequence that we up wasti=
ng
>> time doing a lot of backports from trunk to the release branch. It would=
 be
>> great if we could avoid all of that this time around.
>>=20
>> Thanks.
>>=20
>> Carl
>>=20
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashutosh@apache.org
>>> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi all,
>>>=20
>>> Branch for 0.8-r2 was created on Dec 7, almost four months ago. Between
>>> then and now lots of cool stuff has landed in trunk waiting to be
>> released
>>> and get to users. I think its a good time now to get the ball rolling f=
or
>>> 0.9 release.   If this sounds good, I would propose to cut a branch for
>> 0.9
>>> later this week. Then we can focus on stabilizing the branch and
>> subsequent
>>> release from it.  Thoughts?
>>>=20
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ashutosh
>>>=20
>>=20