Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hive-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49914 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 21:36:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 May 2010 21:36:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 12799 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 21:36:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hive-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12764 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 21:36:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hive-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12756 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 21:36:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 21:36:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 21:36:27 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o45La53H002808 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 21:36:05 GMT Message-ID: <3950873.31691273095365425.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 17:36:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Namit Jain (JIRA)" To: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HIVE-1293) Concurreny Model for Hive In-Reply-To: <1912839159.1091270683576781.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12864520#action_12864520 ] Namit Jain commented on HIVE-1293: ---------------------------------- Forgot to add before, I was thinking of a one-to-map mapping between a table and a znode. For eg: if there are 2 tables: T1 and T2 with partitions T1.p=1, T1.p=2 and T2.p1=1,p2=1 and T2.p1=1,p2=2 respectively, the corresponding znodes will be: T1 -> p=1 -> p=2 T2 -> p1=1 ->p2=1 ->p2=2 > Concurreny Model for Hive > ------------------------- > > Key: HIVE-1293 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1293 > Project: Hadoop Hive > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Query Processor > Reporter: Namit Jain > Assignee: Namit Jain > > Concurrency model for Hive: > Currently, hive does not provide a good concurrency model. The only guanrantee provided in case of concurrent readers and writers is that > reader will not see partial data from the old version (before the write) and partial data from the new version (after the write). > This has come across as a big problem, specially for background processes performing maintenance operations. > The following possible solutions come to mind. > 1. Locks: Acquire read/write locks - they can be acquired at the beginning of the query or the write locks can be delayed till move > task (when the directory is actually moved). Care needs to be taken for deadlocks. > 2. Versioning: The writer can create a new version if the current version is being read. Note that, it is not equivalent to snapshots, > the old version can only be accessed by the current readers, and will be deleted when all of them have finished. > Comments. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.