Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hive-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47420 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2009 17:14:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2009 17:14:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 43868 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 17:14:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hive-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43819 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 17:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hive-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43809 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2009 17:14:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:14:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:14:41 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB3B234C045 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:14:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1138855590.1259946860892.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:14:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Namit Jain (JIRA)" To: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HIVE-971) allow more tables in union all In-Reply-To: <1076118788.1259912601336.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12786004#action_12786004 ] Namit Jain commented on HIVE-971: --------------------------------- We fixed a bunch of bugs for the same issue a few months back. Did you try it out ? > allow more tables in union all > ------------------------------- > > Key: HIVE-971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-971 > Project: Hadoop Hive > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Query Processor > Reporter: Hao Liu > > We used to union more than 128 tables in hive, which did not work. But it is a useful feature to support query aggregating multi fct tables. > (not sue if it is fixed already, pls. close the task if it is not true any longer) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.