heron-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament"<johndam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Heron Grant Status & Monthly Reporting
Date Sat, 21 Oct 2017 22:37:12 GMT
I just looked, your reporting group is 2, so you'll have to report in November anyways.  So
agreed with the +0 since you're already reporting :-)

John

On 2017-10-19 10:49, Bill Graham <billgraham@gmail.com> wrote: 
> +0 If those that requesting monthly reporting feel that's necessary we can
> do so.
> 
> In LEGAL-339 we concluded that we can import code into apache without the
> SGA. I'll move forward with a discussion on that topic in another thread.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:49 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > All, this thread started up with a request to stay monthly.  Is Heron
> > staying monthly?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On 2017-09-21 15:57, Fu Maosong <maosongfu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I will check with Twitter Legal next week too. They are pretty busy;
> > > hopefully we can get some response from them.
> > >
> > > 2017-09-20 10:14 GMT-07:00 Karthik Ramasamy <karthik@streaml.io>:
> > >
> > > > CLA agreements from individual contributors are with Twitter. I am not
> > at
> > > > Twitter anymore. Perhaps Twitter folks can check?
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:28 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > That's actually really useful information, thanks Karthik!
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have the ability to send the CLAs to us, for all contributors
> > to
> > > > > Heron?
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:18 AM Karthik Ramasamy <karthik@streaml.io
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > All -
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just to clarify - as far as I know, Storm code is used only
at two
> > > > > places -
> > > > > > for ensuring API compatibility (a thin wrapper on the underlying
> > Heron
> > > > > API)
> > > > > > and for implementation of Window functions (with modifications).
> > Rest
> > > > of
> > > > > > the code were original contributions from people at
> > > > > > Twitter/Streamlio/Microsoft/Google/Fitbit/Wanda Group and other
> > > > > companies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When a new contributor contributes code, he/she has to accept
an
> > CLA
> > > > > > available at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://legal.twitter.com/contributor-license-agreement.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers
> > > > > > /karthik
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > > > > > bdelacretaz@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:28 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > ...Twitter doesn't actually
> > > > > > > > own the copyright on all of the code (see [1] as an
example),
> > > > because
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > that I'm not sure a grant would actually be valid
at this
> > time...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I guess that's the key point then: who owns the copyright
on the
> > code
> > > > > > > that's being donated.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From the Incubator PMC's perspective, what's needed IMO
is a
> > > > > > > documented statement of that, and maybe a LEGAL- ticket
to
> > clarify
> > > > > > > things if needed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Statements like "I believe X is the owner" don't work,
you need
> > > > > > > documented evidence.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Bertrand
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > > > 64bbb16137225217a5626108801a4f
> > > > > > > c2ed940382000204f8633aa378@%3Cdev.heron.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > With my best Regards
> > > ------------------
> > > Fu Maosong
> > > Twitter Inc.
> > > Mobile: +001-415-244-7520
> > >
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message