heron-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Graham <billgra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Heron Grant Status & Monthly Reporting
Date Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:49:53 GMT
+0 If those that requesting monthly reporting feel that's necessary we can
do so.

In LEGAL-339 we concluded that we can import code into apache without the
SGA. I'll move forward with a discussion on that topic in another thread.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:49 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
wrote:

> All, this thread started up with a request to stay monthly.  Is Heron
> staying monthly?
>
> John
>
> On 2017-09-21 15:57, Fu Maosong <maosongfu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will check with Twitter Legal next week too. They are pretty busy;
> > hopefully we can get some response from them.
> >
> > 2017-09-20 10:14 GMT-07:00 Karthik Ramasamy <karthik@streaml.io>:
> >
> > > CLA agreements from individual contributors are with Twitter. I am not
> at
> > > Twitter anymore. Perhaps Twitter folks can check?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:28 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > That's actually really useful information, thanks Karthik!
> > > >
> > > > Do you have the ability to send the CLAs to us, for all contributors
> to
> > > > Heron?
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:18 AM Karthik Ramasamy <karthik@streaml.io
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > All -
> > > > >
> > > > > Just to clarify - as far as I know, Storm code is used only at two
> > > > places -
> > > > > for ensuring API compatibility (a thin wrapper on the underlying
> Heron
> > > > API)
> > > > > and for implementation of Window functions (with modifications).
> Rest
> > > of
> > > > > the code were original contributions from people at
> > > > > Twitter/Streamlio/Microsoft/Google/Fitbit/Wanda Group and other
> > > > companies.
> > > > >
> > > > > When a new contributor contributes code, he/she has to accept an
> CLA
> > > > > available at
> > > > >
> > > > > https://legal.twitter.com/contributor-license-agreement.html
> > > > >
> > > > > cheers
> > > > > /karthik
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > > > > bdelacretaz@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:28 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > ...Twitter doesn't actually
> > > > > > > own the copyright on all of the code (see [1] as an example),
> > > because
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > that I'm not sure a grant would actually be valid at this
> time...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess that's the key point then: who owns the copyright on
the
> code
> > > > > > that's being donated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From the Incubator PMC's perspective, what's needed IMO is a
> > > > > > documented statement of that, and maybe a LEGAL- ticket to
> clarify
> > > > > > things if needed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Statements like "I believe X is the owner" don't work, you need
> > > > > > documented evidence.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Bertrand
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > > 64bbb16137225217a5626108801a4f
> > > > > > c2ed940382000204f8633aa378@%3Cdev.heron.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > With my best Regards
> > ------------------
> > Fu Maosong
> > Twitter Inc.
> > Mobile: +001-415-244-7520
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message