helix-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Craig <mcr...@box.com>
Subject Re: Too-aggressive FULL_AUTO rebalancing? (maybe fixed @ master)
Date Sat, 22 Oct 2016 00:08:08 GMT
I'm not sure. The diff between 0.6.6 and master is enormous :(
https://github.com/apache/helix/compare/helix-0.6.6...master

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:30 PM, kishore g <g.kishore@gmail.com> wrote:

> Will take a look at it. Do you know what's the difference between master
> and 0.6.6 tag. We can pull that change into 0.6.6
>
> On Oct 21, 2016 4:10 PM, "Michael Craig" <mcraig@box.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok. I tried the helix-0.6.6 tag from GH and found the issue is still
>> present:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/mkscrg/628ab964995c0be914d44654d26ae
>> 561/5af298a63c6796d4f087bc345179ae1fd5aabc33
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:22 PM, kishore g <g.kishore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes it should be fixed in 0.6.6. Lei is working on the release.
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2016 1:52 PM, "Michael Craig" <mcraig@box.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> (This came up in a prior thread—moving it out to clarify it from that
>>>> other question.)
>>>>
>>>> With helix-0.6.5, FULL_AUTO rebalancing seems too aggressive when nodes
>>>> reconnect to the cluster. For example, with 2 nodes + 1 resource (1
>>>> replica, 1 partition) + OnlineOffline: https://gist.gi
>>>> thub.com/mkscrg/628ab964995c0be914d44654d26ae561/99348c870e9
>>>> f028048c1d1cfdd15976325f293f9
>>>>
>>>> However, this seems to be fixed at the current master branch on GitHub:
>>>> https://gist.github.com/mkscrg/628ab964995c0be914d44
>>>> 654d26ae561/ec26a64a74b50c8c125ccd1f9bde1d8aa848a0b5
>>>>
>>>> Will this fix be released in an 0.6.x version?
>>>>
>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message