helix-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kanak Biscuitwala <kbiscuitw...@linkedin.com>
Subject Re: Is josql a mandatory depedency?
Date Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:31:49 GMT
Thanks Ioannis!

On 11/14/13 11:43 AM, "Ioannis Canellos" <iocanel@gmail.com> wrote:

>The fusesource repositories have been migrated to jboss. You can find
>the artifact at:
>https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/fs-public/net/sf/josql/j
>osql/
>
>An other alternative is to use the josql bundles under servicemix
>bundles: 
>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.ser
>vicemix.bundles.josql
>which is the same artifact + osgi metadata.
>
>On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:51 PM, kishore g <g.kishore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Olivier, can we upload this to maven central.
>>
>> If we cannot upload it to maven central, lets try to upload the jar to
>> sonatype or nexus repository.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Kanak Biscuitwala
>> <kbiscuitwala@linkedin.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We need to prioritize this.
>>>
>>> helix --> camel-josql --> net.sf.josql, but the repo containing
>>> net.sf.josql (http://repo.fusesource.com/maven2) has been emptied.
>>> Therefore, anyone building Helix from a clean local maven repo is
>>>unable
>>> to do so.
>>>
>>> Alexandre, you work at Red Hat, which now owns FuseSource, would you by
>>> any chance have some context about the present and future of the
>>> FuseSource Maven repository?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kanak
>>>
>>> On 11/8/13 10:18 AM, "Alexandre Porcelli" <porcelli@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Thank you all for quick reply..
>>> >
>>> > So I can't remove (i'm using messaging service).
>>> >
>>> > Now a 2nd question: how are you resolving this dependency (assuming
>>>an
>>> >empty .m2)? Our Nexus doesn't have reference to it neither maven
>>> >central...
>>> >
>>> >Regards,
>>> >---
>>> >Alexandre Porcelli
>>> >Principal Software Engineer
>>> >Red Hat Business Systems and Intelligence Group
>>> >
>>> >On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:14 PM, kishore g <g.kishore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> That is correct, its only used in messaging service to send
>>>messages.
>>> >>Josql is definitely something we want to remove the dependency.
>>> >>
>>> >> If you are not using this, you can remove it the dependency at
>>>runtime.
>>> >>
>>> >> thanks,
>>> >> Kishore G
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Kanak Biscuitwala
>>> >><kbiscuitwala@linkedin.com> wrote:
>>> >> It seems to be used for our messaging service to send messages, but
>>>for
>>> >> the most part it is used for the "scheduler message" functionality,
>>> >>which
>>> >> you likely don't use. The way the code is structured, you would
>>>have to
>>> >> rip methods out of DefaultMessagingService (namely send and
>>> >>sendAndWait).
>>> >> I believe Kishore has mentioned that josql is perhaps not even the
>>>best
>>> >> way to do this, and we're always trying to reduce dependencies, but
>>>it
>>> >> will require some work to create a replacement.
>>> >>
>>> >> On 11/8/13 9:02 AM, "Alexandre Porcelli" <porcelli@redhat.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >Hello Guys,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > We're facing some issues to resolve net.sf.josql:josql:jar:1.5
>>> >>artifact
>>> >> >in our current setup... I'd like to know if this is really
>>>mandatory
>>> >> > or
>>> >> >if it's not used by `core` what parts use it that allowed me to
>>>check
>>> >>if
>>> >> >I'm using those parts somehow.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Thanks in Advance,
>>> >> >---
>>> >> >Alexandre Porcelli
>>> >> >Principal Software Engineer
>>> >> >Red Hat Business Systems and Intelligence Group
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Ioannis Canellos
>
>Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>Twitter: iocanel


Mime
View raw message