Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-helix-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-helix-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 120F110BCC for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32536 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2013 05:05:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-helix-user-archive@helix.apache.org Received: (qmail 32463 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2013 05:05:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@helix.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@helix.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@helix.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 32453 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2013 05:05:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:05:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of erwin.karbasi@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.179] (HELO mail-ve0-f179.google.com) (209.85.128.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:05:27 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f179.google.com with SMTP id d10so123144vea.10 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:05:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CX02DrK5aJ5Ou/+MoD6XPkFa2jGUcQZQkdNFcfWTP1E=; b=p/IH3ObwTnuz83OQQM9PsZ3qr7aHOPvwxFYLZf2QBigOgWZ6asi+88j4Muk8SDakCL 4OPhYS6BydAa7OhdPy1COD1dqSgwlw9Lcg981hMjJJPbr7YsfkOdgYscOXnLxZ/mdDYn t9Vy29tFWNDlVUD3c27F62z/eov6yjz4WCJLOwHkqmqNNe911ZX6Wix0TXiJMePZ2pvi 3ru7Oytfn9MgQ9goamz4soze83NST6wv0+uwcMhBizGmeySpCWl9/e+5qr4UFLx6SC5h pXby+KUtWEXLVkXF1DZ4fVpjR9+TDsJeEiHkCX2fXIRKYUdIYTMk6CizXb8CF8Ofz17A rdvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.11.143 with SMTP id t15mr299810vct.68.1371186306522; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: erwin.karbasi@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.40.193 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.40.193 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:05:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:05:06 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MeU_7Gykd-gR4wFIE83rtG_G2ck Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is zookeeper for Helix has standalone JAVA process? From: Erwin Karbasi To: user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3ae6ab8a4ce04df16306a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c3ae6ab8a4ce04df16306a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Kishore, We have more then 50 nodes. Cheers, Erwin On Jun 14, 2013 1:51 AM, "kishore g" wrote: > Hi Erwin, > > How many nodes do you have in your cluster ? > > thanks, > Kishore G > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Erwin Karbasi wrote: > >> Hello Maters, >> >> We don't want to have separate/specific JAVA process for Zookeeper. >> As I figured out from the Master-Slave sample we can start the Zookeeper >> programmatically using the Zookeeper API. >> >> I have several questions: >> >> 1. If we are using the Zookeeper API for initializing the Zookeeper from >> the Helix app (out app that uses Helix) would we have specific process for >> Zookeeper? Would we have one process for our app and another for the >> Zookeeper? >> What happens if we'll not initialize the Zookeeper from the Helix app >> programmatically but using the commands, whether then would we have >> specific process for Zookeeper? >> >> 2. If we'll decide to initialize Zookeeper from Helix app, >> programmatically, How can we use Zookeeper clustering (ensemble) , is there >> any API for Zookeeper clustering, any direction would highly appreciated. >> >> 3. Is it possible to start the Zookeeper by using commands and not >> initializing specific process for it but using the Helix app (our app that >> uses Helix API)? >> >> I hope my questions are enough clear. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Erwin Karbasi >> AT&T, Senior Software Architect >> > > --001a11c3ae6ab8a4ce04df16306a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Kishore,

We have=A0 more then 50 nodes.

Cheers,
Erwin

On Jun 14, 2013 1:51 AM, "kishore g" &= lt;g.kishore@gmail.com> wrote= :
Hi Erwin,

How many nodes do you have in= your cluster ?

thanks,
Kishore G
<= /div>


On Thu, = Jun 13, 2013 = at 1:43 PM, Erwin Karbasi <erwin@optinity.com> wrote:
Hello Maters,

We don't want to have separate/specific J= AVA process for Zookeeper.
As I figured out from the Master-Slave sample we can start the Zookee= per programmatically using the Zookeeper API.

I have several questions:

1. If we are using the Zoo= keeper API for initializing the Zookeeper from the Helix app (out app that = uses Helix) would we have specific process for Zookeeper? Would we have one= process for our app and another for the Zookeeper?
What happens if we'll not initialize the Zookeeper from the Helix app p= rogrammatically but using the commands, whether then would we have specific= process for Zookeeper?

2. If we'll decide to initialize Z= ookeeper from Helix app, programmatically, How can we use Zookeeper cluster= ing (ensemble) , is there any API for Zookeeper clustering, any direction w= ould highly appreciated.

3. Is it possible to start the Zookeeper by using commands and no= t initializing specific process for it but using the Helix app (our app tha= t uses Helix API)?

I hope my questions are enough cl= ear.

Thanks in advance,
Erwin Karbasi
AT&T, Senior Software Architect

--001a11c3ae6ab8a4ce04df16306a--