Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FFB200B25 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:05:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 55882160A29; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C132160A15 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:05:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 281 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2016 13:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpClient User Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list httpclient-users@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 269 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2016 13:05:30 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 13:05:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B69BD18052A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:05:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.801 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.801 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yandex.ru Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G7mSbF0Dca-p for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward2p.cmail.yandex.net (forward2p.cmail.yandex.net [77.88.31.17]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1514B5F343 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxback2g.mail.yandex.net (mxback2g.mail.yandex.net [77.88.29.163]) by forward2p.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D28BE20F9A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:05:16 +0300 (MSK) Received: from web1g.yandex.ru (web1g.yandex.ru [95.108.252.101]) by mxback2g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 39IL8N4kVl-5FQaGSYK; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 16:05:15 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1465391115; bh=z+g2QlHqUSoMKQLJB++rltFffmJ+ACTPJtQa9lqorXg=; h=X-Yandex-Sender-Uid:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Message-Id:X-Mailer:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type; b=m2mWb5QZcfuOrDMZo1A0P9y+r71IN9+lGmU6W1eTB3K1vesqwLR0N0pUsIfg4eBOT GYLdAjgYrgwWBKptXcqTottI7ARBbJ+Q+7YQ5b7NdrABf7teIgNaPbLuJce1ctKUhQ OdgEpj8ggs+5yaGVLIsKoYXZl8x0CwJmz/Iqmcy8= Authentication-Results: mxback2g.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 328946579 X-Yandex-Sender-Uid: 117905296 Received: by web1g.yandex.ru with HTTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 16:05:15 +0300 From: Ponomarenko Andrey To: HttpClient User Discussion In-Reply-To: <1465304938.27478.9.camel@apache.org> References: <2542631465225755@web9h.yandex.ru> <1465304938.27478.9.camel@apache.org> Subject: Re: Backward compatibility report MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <6632051465391115@web1g.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 16:05:15 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 archived-at: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 13:05:32 -0000 Hello, Thank you for reporting this bug. Usually the tool checks super-classes and doesn't report removal of overwritten methods. But in this case the super-class is defined in the different jar (httpcore-4.2.5.jar) and therefore it was not taken into account. I'll try to fix the report soon. 07.06.2016, 16:09, "Oleg Kalnichevski": > On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 18:09 +0300, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: >>  Hello, >> >>  I've prepared backward compatibility reports for HttpClient and HttpCore libraries: >> >>  http://abi-laboratory.pro/java/tracker/timeline/httpclient/ >>  http://abi-laboratory.pro/java/tracker/timeline/httpcore/ >> >>  I hope they will help users, maintainers and developers to maintain backward compatibility. The reports are updated daily by the japi-compliance-checker and japi-tracker tools: https://github.com/lvc/japi-compliance-checker >> >>  Please let me know if there are some false positives in the report. >> >>  Thank you. > > Hi Andrey > > The reports look pretty awesome. > > However, if I am not mistaken removal of overwritten methods from a > subclass should not affect binary compatibility, should it? > > http://abi-laboratory.pro/java/tracker/compat_report/httpcore/4.2.5/4.3/55421/bin_compat_report.html#Removed > > High severity for these changes sounds a bit too much if you ask me. > > Oleg > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org