Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E90318233 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44233 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2016 14:20:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 44207 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2016 14:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpClient User Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list httpclient-users@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 44195 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2016 14:20:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:20:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 22CCEC0D30 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:20:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=grupoventus.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9aqXu82c0Ys for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.feelhosting.com (mail01.feelhosting.com [178.33.117.161]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 676C05F56F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Ventus (62.83.140.177.dyn.user.ono.com [62.83.140.177]) by mail01.ad-6bits.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BDA9C3FE3D for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:20:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=grupoventus.com; s=default; t=1457101224; bh=RBMG2uGPnzbpcnaePAz6yyo6g/Gjpj/jF95rqKh+K+g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=MoJsy0UjdQquxtGc6dvE7YBbqY2zbkhI01Yl1luZ9v3HOh7t9VSCrhSDXnSQpyocj Nc8SRx6UwxG3Yl6MpuoVHdApbitfDkV0Bx0hapng8za21xM2RkbceNnBvwfaMqJnoq dqwsnQt6aSqC/zG4tlmIGOVQ0qbPNxaaf57MgBD0= From: =?utf-8?Q?Joan_Balaguer=C3=B3?= To: "'HttpClient User Discussion'" Subject: Async client Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:20:23 +0100 Message-ID: <006b01d17620$fda512e0$f8ef38a0$@grupoventus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdF2H9nInNlsUV9rTbmv/M4TkhP/mw== Content-Language: es Hello, We are starting to work with the Async http client. We are creating a = PoolingNHttpClientConnectionManager (translating our old = PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager to a = PoolingNHttpClientConnectionManager). Here we have 2 questions: 1. Hasn't the async client a retry handler and a stale check validation? = 2. When we set the connection and response timeout at IOReactor level = and RequestConfig level, what takes precedence? Thanks, Joan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org