hc-httpclient-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Conley <mike.con...@unizin.org>
Subject Re: Responding adaptively to 503 errors (including respecting the Retry-After header)
Date Wed, 14 Oct 2015 21:02:05 GMT
Oh, nice! I assume this hasn’t been released yet, though, right? If it has been, the javadocs
need updating :P

Glad it’s been handled either way. Thanks for the info.

> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:59 PM, Stefan Magnus Landrø <stefan.landro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Newer versions handle the retry-after header:
> https://github.com/apache/httpclient/blob/trunk/httpclient/src/main/java/org/apache/http/client/ServiceUnavailableRetryStrategy.java
> Have a look at the default impl:
> https://github.com/apache/httpclient/blob/trunk/httpclient/src/main/java/org/apache/http/impl/client/DefaultServiceUnavailableRetryStrategy.java
> 2015-10-14 22:49 GMT+02:00 Mike Conley <mike.conley@unizin.org>:
>> Hi.
>> I’m writing an OAI harvester (it’s an obscure protocol you’ve probably
>> never heard of for the exchange of metadata with content repositories). The
>> implementation guidelines mention 503 handling:
>> http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/guidelines-harvester.htm#FlowControl.
>> In particular, the suggestion is to respect the Retry-After header if
>> present.
>> When last I did this, I had to implement it myself, but I see that
>> HttpClient 4 has 503 handling built in.
>> http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/httpclient/apidocs/org/apache/http/client/ServiceUnavailableRetryStrategy.html
>> But I’m not sure how to use this if the retry interval should vary
>> per-response. getRetryInterval takes no arguments, and in particular has no
>> access to the HttpResponse, so I’m not sure how I could go about using
>> this. I had considered storing something when the call to retryRequest is
>> made, but I’m not sure this is safe to do (it seems likely that it is not,
>> since the strategy is almost certainly shared among multiple threads). It
>> also seems kind of kludgy to me. Is there a way to do this cleanly? If not,
>> is there a thread safe way to keep this state around between calls to the
>> two methods?
> --
> BEKK Open
> http://open.bekk.no
> TesTcl - a unit test framework for iRules
> http://testcl.com

View raw message