Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8302D10877 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42814 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 18:31:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 42757 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 18:31:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpClient User Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list httpclient-users@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 42749 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2013 18:31:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:31:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jkienzle@salesforce.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.170] (HELO mail-qc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.216.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:31:10 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id m20so3012483qcx.1 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:30:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=/3slSf1QIQLK32xe/utGToAR4LN42ZbMjWgn/W07UXQ=; b=ENpeAYi5cCKX4nT7MLK/qznV2mHLQzPtURPzCxgWlS7nXGDKaYOT4d44O9EgivhSLY 9DhP45ZNIUrQQEmzLwRxEngEwq78BxwHU72BGxYm7B8xRGkZXdZUvQo4dhAEu73riyKK DHg3D8blQOF6rQ9uzD9zw+OVP+SNUi7ZEAHEsECg2E7Dvq1bD1Q7x7xa+gfkjDo4OgCd STuH0Jr0oB7aoOEBerEnNOqzFo1zPbWtAED2guSKP2icljOwK0fcGVQjSqgaHTZnTAXz 3IWnPUxkj2IjZoUIYSALBVwQYNBVOi47VFLEJd7Kb/PDQlp5CD/wq9W2n3Io2TfG/I74 GSMg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4vHE6w2kEakQCKgl3lq+h90eWmMhTGzaflBcIj7ZhPsvPtV6eAIYBYjqDepsjC8GpeZpg X-Received: by 10.224.15.202 with SMTP id l10mr1015904qaa.24.1379356250047; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:30:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.105.9 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:30:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1379332969.9967.17.camel@ubuntu> From: Johannes Kienzle Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:30:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [POLL] Minimal JRE level as of HttpClient 4.4 To: HttpClient User Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc1b904d9a2204e684675a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bdc1b904d9a2204e684675a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ------------------- [ ] keep Java 1.5 compatibility: no good reason to upgrade. [ ] upgrade to Java 1.6: one step at a time. [X] upgrade to Java 1.7: new features are more important. ------------------- On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Erik Pilz wrote: > ------------------- > [ ] keep Java 1.5 compatibility: no good reason to upgrade. > [ ] upgrade to Java 1.6: one step at a time. > [X] upgrade to Java 1.7: new features are more important. > ------------------- > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski > wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > Java 1.5 compatibility has become increasing difficult to maintain and > > increasing pointless on top of that. We, as a project, have been > > thinking about upgrading minimal JRE level requirement for the > > HttpClient 4.4 branch to something newer. While Java 1.6 might be a > > reasonable and a conservative choice in terms of stability and adoption, > > it actually brings little in terms of new features we could make use of > > in HttpClient. Besides, Java 1.6 is officially end of life. So, we might > > as well consider upgrading to Java 1.7 which would give us NIO2, full > > support for 'try with resources', and probably some other features. > > > > Please let us know what you think and respond to this poll. > > > > All users of HttpClient are encouraged to participate. Every vote will > > count. > > > > ------------------- > > [ ] keep Java 1.5 compatibility: no good reason to upgrade. > > [ ] upgrade to Java 1.6: one step at a time. > > [ ] upgrade to Java 1.7: new features are more important. > > ------------------- > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org > > > > > --047d7bdc1b904d9a2204e684675a--