Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3FD2703E for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53490 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2011 18:32:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 53455 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2011 18:32:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpClient User Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list httpclient-users@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 53447 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2011 18:32:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:32:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hosier.david@me.com designates 17.148.16.101 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.101] (HELO asmtpout026.mac.com) (17.148.16.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:32:36 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from meshuggah (ip65-46-236-26.z236-46-65.customer.algx.net [65.46.236.26]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01(7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LSN00IHXQ509Q40@asmtp026.mac.com> for httpclient-users@hc.apache.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:31:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-06_07:2011-10-06,2011-10-06,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=9 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1110060192 Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:31:48 -0700 From: David Hosier To: HttpClient User Discussion Message-id: <99E9166A0AEA44DB964308B0E9582580@me.com> In-reply-to: <1317925742.3337.234.camel@ubuntu> References: <1317892944.3337.195.camel@ubuntu> <383F75F72EF24E4EB1035DF7F85FC96F@me.com> <1317904786.3337.229.camel@ubuntu> <29F4D2547C974F5696478D7EF195D4BF@me.com> <1317925742.3337.234.camel@ubuntu> Subject: Re: Broken BasicResponseHandler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (1.4.904) / sparrow 1.4 (build 904) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm using the DefaultHttpClient to make the call, yes. I want to use DefaultHttpClient with the ResponseHandler the way I am supposed to. However, the API does not give me the ability to get a hold of the Entity if the status code is 404, because it throws an Exception which does not contain the entity value. I need the Entity value, even if the call returns 404. As far as I can tell, I cannot get the information I need from the API the way it is designed to be used. Is that clearer? Is my assessment correct? -- David Hosier On Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 10:47 -0700, David Hosier wrote: > > I am using this to interface with some REST services. One key to a good REST service is to never let something like a 404 spit out the server's generic 404 HTML page in response to a REST request. So my service instead returns an entity with the 404 that says something like "Could not find alert 12334". I should be able to show this response entity. However, given the way the ResponseHandler works with HttpClient, this is not possible, because the entity is not part of the Exception that is thrown when the ResponseHandler encounters a 404. Without manually reading the entity after ResponseHandler throws an Exception, I would only be able to show the fields that are contained in the Exception. That means I could only show the text 'Not Found', which is hardly meaningful since the status code of 404 already tells me that. > > You are using ResponseHandler to interface with some REST services > without using DefaultHttpClient? I am sorry but it still makes no sense > to me. You might as well handle responses from that service _any_ way > you like without using a ResponseHandler. > > Oleg > > > -- David Hosier > > > > On Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 02:59 -0700, David Hosier wrote: > > > > Ok, I see what the difference is in this situation. I am not passing the ResponseHandler to the execute() method. I am actually calling handleResponse() on the ResponseHandler manually. > > > > > > I honestly see no sense in doing so. ResponseHandler is pretty much > > > useless without the resource management code in AbstractHttpClient. > > > > > > What is the reason you want to invoke #handleResponse manually? > > > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > The problem I have with the implementation is that I return error messages on error conditions. With the way this works, you can only get very basic information from the HttpResponseException. For example, on a 404, it looks like the Exception only contains 404 and 'Not Found'. I am able to pluck out the entity when invoking handleResponse() manually by simply consuming the entity myself, but it's not possible to get the entity if the ResponseHandler is passed to execute() and the status is not 2xx. Am I off base here or is my analysis correct? Would you recommend that if I really need the entity on a non-2xx response that I just keep manually consuming the entity? I'm not sure it would make sense for your library to attempt to consume the entity in BasicResponseHandler and try to add it as an > > > > other fi > > > > eld to the HttpResponseException. The AbstractHttpClient code you linked me to would have to change if you did that. > > > > > > > > -- David Hosier > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 2:30 AM, David Hosier wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 6, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 13:44 -0700, David Hosier wrote: > > > > > > > Perhaps I'm wrong, but the code for BasicResponseHandler in httpclient 4.1.2 does not satisfy the javadocs as written. The javadoc states the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "If the response code was >= 300, the response body is consumed and an HttpResponseException (http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/httpclient/apidocs/org/apache/http/client/HttpResponseException.html) is thrown." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, the code does not do that: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > StatusLine statusLine = response.getStatusLine(); > > > > > > > if (statusLine.getStatusCode() >= 300) { > > > > > > > throw new HttpResponseException(statusLine.getStatusCode(), > > > > > > > statusLine.getReasonPhrase()); > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HttpEntity entity = response.getEntity(); > > > > > > > return entity == null ? null : EntityUtils.toString(entity); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The code clearly throws the Exception without reading the entity. So what happens is that if you get a non-2xx response, connections are never released as can be seen by enabling DEBUG logging for the library. Am I misreading the code or javadocs, or is this really broken? If I catch the Exception and then read the entity manually like shown above, I can see the connections being closed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi David > > > > > > The resource management is taken care of by HttpClient [1]. I do not > > > > > > think BasicResponseHandler is broken. The whole point of ResponseHandler > > > > > > is to free the user from having to worry about resource management and > > > > > > response entities. > > > > > Interesting. Thanks for the link to the code. I can assure you that in my situation however, that the connections are not getting closed. I'll take a closer look at the code and compare it to this linked code to see if I'm using the right stuff. My assumption at this point then is that I'm just doing something wrong. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/httpclient/xref/org/apache/http/impl/client/AbstractHttpClient.html#930 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org) > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org) > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org) > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org) > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org) > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org) > > > For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org) > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org) > > For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org) > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org) > For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org (mailto:httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org