Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38889 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 10:42:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 10:42:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 60479 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 10:42:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 60365 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 10:42:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpClient User Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list httpclient-users@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 60354 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 10:42:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:42:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of craig.blackman2@googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.179] (HELO mail-ey0-f179.google.com) (209.85.215.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:42:39 +0000 Received: by eyg24 with SMTP id 24so1345364eyg.10 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:42:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dKPVRhXC3/mjlGEtTXoEZOYEoSJ+33oW8kdmSRoinJc=; b=hlKdayvEPtjgR/mX0dq0uHQL9AxjouDTvn/hcQ9P/plou+PV9Ee9C34Rc79gVGLDLP tS8WXgn7cO4JoTwXrCr0VQCvOixMuxC9pSPsdCHRWgKPthWS6rrf0ZBcBEQ6GtOzZlHE wIyiaHaSVDATOXmx9E6d5OnUlng01ajV96YT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TBZ2unc0mDfHHtxo0CLm/sbUpPnnLGiAWVIJTyOnoxQza3xBqLEr4o3uZCDv1zFZ96 pdrSYU4t/JhaDzaej9OuPJhQz5GF8D85EH3q8IJjIcrF0/pxzmj5lYLp0SFtqedTX86w UcqUa2GP78/dv3f822hbjwgdROjgR+3Fsuhj8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.21.136 with SMTP id j8mr435436ebb.41.1288867337521; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.124.16 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 03:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:42:17 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: commons httpclient backwards compatibility between version 2 and 3.1 From: Craig Blackman To: httpclient-users@hc.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c434ed0c914049437cfc5 --0015174c434ed0c914049437cfc5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Is release 3.1 backwards compatible with release 2.0 please? I.e. a release 2 jar could be upgraded to release 3.1 and code that used the release 2 jar would still function correctly? Apologies if this is a mis-directed question but I'm struggling to find any reference regarding backwards compatibility. All responses appreciated. Kind regards Craig Blackman --0015174c434ed0c914049437cfc5--