Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27351 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 07:50:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 07:50:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 93789 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 07:50:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 93701 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 07:50:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpClient User Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list httpclient-users@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 93693 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 07:50:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:50:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ctlaux@googlemail.com designates 74.125.83.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.51] (HELO mail-gw0-f51.google.com) (74.125.83.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:50:06 +0000 Received: by gwaa20 with SMTP id a20so2587506gwa.10 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:49:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kv0p+I1HS30w7MTfe/1TmUnRKOUofTJ4dXOG3T2R7js=; b=YrJ1bHSDyHwDY6RIZt2X8tUoOIxxTl2e0BmPUkYs3Jvm/7lQOBj3owucEx7P6cTH9h FNdzpAbmZmyiZngzMkZuBUU4CcKqrQUAwK9gCM7a5OfmLdtlxmmBAzvRHh4YYvsLAvyh ZZjwgUq7ytOi7S3mamif5z+UV/BF0MTr4wfik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=P2XOJtFST6Lj+Mj0kwLTYnqGRKsDmmSBTL6650BUEHOsTB4nqR/yxj3vX8JhSwhF4d D/nJG/er7pCt7HI05Rh9Rt2czXM2Vlp6hwvVj+vdT6whfsTzJtTRDHixxiq0oY2oBffH HF+831XyMFVGvL9IotN5qzQFUdX3WS8L5MDrk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.202.11 with SMTP id z11mr255083ybf.207.1286956184968; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.109.4 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:49:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:49:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Weird problem with hostname resolution From: Christopher Laux To: HttpClient User Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Thanks for letting us know the resolution. > > So it seems it was resource exhaustion after all, but within the JVM > rather than for the host OS. > Which resource would that be? Resident memory is barely above 300m with a 3g maximum heap size. Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org