Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37282 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2008 14:17:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2008 14:17:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 52873 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2008 14:17:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-httpclient-users-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 52858 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2008 14:17:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpClient User Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list httpclient-users@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 52847 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2008 14:17:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:17:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rajesh.balamohan@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.170.186] (HELO rn-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.170.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:16:50 +0000 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a46so251253rne.9 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:17:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=/64W4J2wp9VKcLDYlUH0J8DkMT/vZugU1l2VQokCkZg=; b=gPaZHhq0zZndWmjwW72VyF/H3e8XCFqsvI7RBtCdAdj9JnzCzeC6rx5UEaBCs7QZaT67QCpp9saXbLRS+DqthpTxzWKta+w7JTjWDDSvGH+2zL1uf29ZnDBjzrdl42+WzpVCty4BDGMzzRCg8+MMYZu4lngErtmBPwjXi5CjzNQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=cZYahdt+qLTizk0fo63IhEV+abmkREpbjwRBjh+92+61fGu4FdoRaChYq1wrhR9wM/mRAUEShmT+PUr9+AHFRA9slYBhT2KMiLMVeAvo8KJsJ3JO1ytdFGsJtez8HyvrLR1gogZNBcvcVrrlU1vfq4vpRQiCTVX+s0niuWLWlkQ= Received: by 10.143.44.17 with SMTP id w17mr321400wfj.242.1209565023675; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.251.19 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1da12e810804300717w56d5b650g761d12db29180083@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:47:03 +0530 From: "Rajesh Balamohan" To: httpclient-users@hc.apache.org Subject: HttpClient 4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2462_7773813.1209565023654" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_2462_7773813.1209565023654 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Currently we are using HttpClient 3.x in production. Is it advisable to move to HttpClient 4.0?. Do we have any performance and scalability improvements. -- ~Rajesh.B ------=_Part_2462_7773813.1209565023654--