Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C411200CB4 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:35:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 5AF87160BDC; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A089F160BC6 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:35:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 17580 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2017 15:35:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 17568 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2017 15:35:18 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:35:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2C799CA896 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:35:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.88 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cd3NKVeL7kcK for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f174.google.com (mail-qt0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 298025FC97 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f174.google.com with SMTP id r30so27606595qtc.0 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 08:35:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=O+/UZ3Khcx8uAWxzRM/8z/i68XaVGVNNMjCEUPmlUFA=; b=AEr0lyLc8ZkAcb7KkTftLWcaLbls9u3l6qc2+lLWZ6Zen8WtfXg31773eVM1u/cPjF plMO0s2MbGYt5xxoviZSfigGhTKhDFR09S6ln7MA41n1tWwgNFbmswiU2uVO+kWR6dAp qDgPqSfrG8Qbf1b/zFEGcS3IjIFQmV5IJnnWg9NQou5xGld4QXkWQHUac04i4/omaA47 /UNWUV89SMZAhYRUZXWkVt54zdTLxfN94OFoViIB4IE/DwJ/VCCjyyEa7HWuYMgT/oj/ mIMXTMt511wLFLTQsHiuk+FU2B79xJt+CvkE4fB9I7Tgm31GtVepGuyy7n2s8p2lYhWz xCQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=O+/UZ3Khcx8uAWxzRM/8z/i68XaVGVNNMjCEUPmlUFA=; b=ROnbU8ECgpKn9eXSW2bX877O2A5dGF9++FofnaD+ZwXuojQDUp9/3mheL0vmQNid+p qVSZKUTkoPIzInthad59X6vchV+I0870wBXDGpAMoIopB8p9eokEDZLcmdy50tbc/xhm vqFLNAvZhovWWaeKfri/RorHu7/ohbQKKu7t0tqhd/IUGBpUHutssbmwukg7qkmj66ha WeDqJK4r5LUJzfaWDlIyUML18vId34oj+7Vxim96PS/5TvzuqLqDLf7Zi6FYivD9j42r QU30bVnb8NDW3m7aNwSg1juZ/K7koJ25fpH6Rd80ztRvQDGZ5NtyZGYcMhdJQGfuXE6B b25Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwRtQGran0XOkE2Atdua6Z+R8R58t2rAQyS9fVbypOZF8QuxWaX 1DccYOqA9ptW+NcI5GhcsRlUbEjYqCP/ X-Received: by 10.200.51.23 with SMTP id t23mr6944565qta.38.1498577715633; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 08:35:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.38.249 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 08:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.200.38.249 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 08:35:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1498562566.24088.2.camel@apache.org> References: <573832AC-086E-40DA-9CAB-C9D316968CE2@16degrees.com.au> <1498562566.24088.2.camel@apache.org> From: Gary Gregory Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 08:35:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Time to give up on Java 7 compatibility? [Fwd: [JENKINS] [IMPORTANT] - Jenkins Migration and Upgrade (And JDK7 deprecation)] To: HttpComponents Project Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114109f068a17f0552f2d0aa" archived-at: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:35:20 -0000 --001a114109f068a17f0552f2d0aa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Giving up Java 7 works for me. It is not clear to me that the Jenkins update does not support Java 7 at all though: "If your Maven projects need to be built with JDK 7, consider converting them to freestyle projects, or look into Maven toolchains." We use Maven toolchains over at Log4j (for building some bits with Java 9) and that works fine. The business SSH slaves does not sound pretty though. Travis-CI still supports Java 7 of course so we can go with that. We just need to decide what matters for 5.0 and 4.6. Java 8 is OK here. Gary On Jun 27, 2017 04:22, "Oleg Kalnichevski" wrote: Folks ASF Jenkins will no longer support Java7 Maven projects soon. That means there will be no way to reliably test Java 7 compatibility anymore. Maybe it is time we gave up on Java 7 compatibility altogether. By the time 5.0.x projects go GA Java 7 may no longer matter. What do you think? Oleg -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Gavin McDonald Reply-to: builds@apache.org To: builds@apache.org Cc: ASF Operations Subject: [JENKINS] [IMPORTANT] - Jenkins Migration and Upgrade (And JDK7 deprecation) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:03:13 +1000 ... 2. Upgrade of Jenkins - Jenkins project released a new LTS release, version 2.60.1. This is a major release and breaks Jenkins in terms of Maven jobs for JDK 7 in the same way that it happened for Maven and JDK 6 a few months back. The infra team (mainly myself) got quite some feedback on not supplying advance notice of this breakage. That upgrade however was necessary due to security fixes that required our upgrade. This email serves as advance warning of the upcoming upgrade of Jenkins, the downtime due to the migration of the service to a new host; and notice of the breakage to JDK 7 that the upgrade brings. Please familiarise yourself with the Jenkins LTS upgrade notes at [1]. In particular please note:- =E2=80=9C=E2=80=A62.60.1 is the first Jenkins LTS release that requires= Java 8 to run. If you're using the Maven Project type, please note that it needs to use a JDK capable of running Jenkins, i.e. JDK 8 or up. If you configure an older JDK in a Maven Project, Jenkins will attempt to find a newer JDK and use that automatically. If your SSH Slaves fail to start and you have the plugin install the JRE to run them, make sure to update SSH Slaves Plugin to at least version 1.17 (1.20 recommended). ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org --001a114109f068a17f0552f2d0aa--