Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678B0200C32 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:07:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 66113160B67; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AE9E2160B64 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:07:20 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 94910 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2017 16:07:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 94892 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2017 16:07:19 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:07:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 19AFB186147 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:07:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.679 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8BQtFaEAYdsX for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f47.google.com (mail-it0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CA0035F1EE for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m27so69213953iti.1 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:07:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=br4563vpxLgEoqfbc7l6vQrMGzldXSekCrt5sT0UC3U=; b=PyTLRCbXfXBlY0Vmi8LYqMU2e/jurrwgxSQPvjhRi58cS76AXxmX9bwnCSsh1HzKJE XOgnccwSepWizo3KKjk0HVlfFmFf3fZSfIXJ02vl7qTQfa47ToAjkdQQbeaZmB94PLhf ujc3xVuF7C4IQ0oMusESDOLs+Tkv5b3T97djwg2YDwE5bZUAx3L+2XXKUyHDrsgs2toZ oxPM4swzTcLoQF1BPi6gIyMx6qBre8PrKKXteiznj56W8QSk7larApeeX49KNGIdB5BZ 0ysJproYvLjpVPZzTWCfmo6enhjqWf9IhHJAryiXOEo5zA86mogKWitopjnSUOpVRBXz VFog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=br4563vpxLgEoqfbc7l6vQrMGzldXSekCrt5sT0UC3U=; b=Nx6L4yf2OgAbPVxh2cxHjP5Pf2IptpljoNgEiVRq1pOdU3Xbeqwa15aGy/RwLOeUJa 4yT3tuWDg/zrZ45+vKZpxWetPBLelQy+zGhe9yhWuVqBUACDvfPYsciyLhYw8sLjOn/h K02l7WuIQltRJCkXidSpq1YNzx9O3+Hc4CBEYxdDwHQpqV3Eo8R/pXB+6FxUdhiEaDFv A6sCuvvXFdwzdJGDwGgoL8X4owvUrS/cuLooGYfq79LBhfZRbbSIe47xrT6udqi6JAyB C6jtwg3riH3NKPqs2qETXBAsscOI68r+gpIyox9hfdVP+bSnSNIUDUTBVjyDbQraa1ge InjA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lGSEKaZNFO/EeOXttUQg8HM7JCq6UkY8wITij9y0NHRv4adiTqCYe7sz3w1T5j4j+0sYgqtvXL5lS23A== X-Received: by 10.36.178.77 with SMTP id h13mr11794874iti.80.1489075636373; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:07:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.73.196 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:07:15 -0800 (PST) From: larry mccay Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:07:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Annotations Removed in 4.5.3? To: dev@hc.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045d8e8e59b23c054a4e70b6 archived-at: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:07:21 -0000 --f403045d8e8e59b23c054a4e70b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi HC devs - Do I understand correctly that the annotations were removed in 4.5.3 in an incompatible way? Maybe I am missing something but breaking the code of existing consumers in a dot release is bad practice. We needed to upgrade to 4.5.3 in order to get the SSL+SPNEGO fix that broke us with 4.5.2 but now doing so breaks our annotation usage. Is there some strategy for existing code to migrate or to use a shim of sorts for this? In the meantime, it seems we will need to downgrade back to 4.5.1 again to avoid the SSL+SPNEGO issue. If there are any critical security fixes/CVEs fixed between dot releases incompatible changes make it risky to upgrade. Hoping that you have some other answer for this. thanks, --larry --f403045d8e8e59b23c054a4e70b6--