hc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OSGi vs. not
Date Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:51:22 GMT
Over at Log4j and Commons, we add the OSGi stuff to the normal jars.

Gary

On Dec 23, 2016 2:04 AM, "Oleg Kalnichevski" <olegk@apache.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 12:51 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > WRT to the VOTE and
> >
> >  224816183f20c871d453b648d465a813 httpcomponents-core-5.0-
> > alpha2-osgi-bin.zip
> >  b8947275fe21cde3e99ee554b9464a95 httpcomponents-core-5.0-alpha2-src.zip
> >
> > Why do we have an OSGi download? What's the diff?
> >
> > Gary
> >
>
> There are two main distinctions
> (1) OSGi bundles usually pull in several Maven artifacts
> (2) They also include OSGi specific functionality such as OSGi container
> integration. This is presently not the case with HttpCore but is
> certainly the case with HttpClient.
>
> I am aware that many projects simply add OSGi metadata to their Maven
> artifacts and do not bother with OSGi specific bundles. I am perfectly
> fine with revising our approach to OSGi support as long as someone is
> willing to make it consistent across all our projects.
>
> I often cannot help feeling that if we are not able to maintain our OSGi
> stuff properly we would be better off dropping it entirely.
>
> Oleg
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message