Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" <dev@hc.apache.org>
Sender: Asankha Perera <asankha.apache@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <564F02B4.2000502@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:53:32 +0530
From: "Asankha C. Perera" <asankha@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HttpComponents Project <dev@hc.apache.org>
Subject: Re: HC 5.0: co-location with HC 4.x
References: <1447932726.2577.28.camel@apache.org>
	 <564E3C76.5090701@apache.org>
	 <CAOGo0Vahjq+5NzqgWpR=ktNCCxK8t8L7EsKOBtWjWoA9eRv3-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1448016659.12920.9.camel@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <1448016659.12920.9.camel@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/20/2015 04:20 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 23:27 +0000, sebb wrote:
>> On 19 November 2015 at 21:17, Michael Osipov <michaelo@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Am 2015-11-19 um 12:32 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski:
> ...
>
>>> First of all, I wouldn't use any of those. (Currently referring to package
>>> names only). Artifact ids are a different story.
>>>
>>> org.apache.http: that is too general and confuses me with Apache HTTP
>>> Server.
>>> org.apache.http.hc: http seems redundant here due to hc (http components).
>>> org.apache.hc<n>.http: same here.
>>>
>>> I would do:
>>>
>>> HC Core: org.apache.hc.core5
>>> HC Client: org.apache.hc.client5
>>> HC Async Cilent: org.apache.hc.asyncclient5
>>>
>>> Clean and simple. Each project would be scoped in its namespace. Picking up
>>> sebb's opinion, we even reflect the HTTP domain in the package name.
>> It's not just my _opinion_.
>> We cannot freely choose the package name, because we are not the only
>> Java project in the world, nor even in the org.apache namespace.
>>
>> Likewise we cannot use the domain com.oracle or com.ibm or even com.apache.
>> We MUST use the ASF domain as the package name prefix or there is a
>> risk of clashes with 3rd party software.
>>
>> org.apache.hc should be OK, since we already use HC for the website.
>> It's very unlikely that any other ASF project will be named HC.
>>
> Would this be all right for everyone?
>
> org.apache.hc.core5.http
+1
asankha

-- 
Asankha C. Perera
AdroitLogic, http://adroitlogic.org

http://esbmagic.blogspot.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org