Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-32831-apmail-hc-dev-archive=hc.apache.org@hc.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0C4A18453
	for <apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:38:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 40474 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2015 17:38:59 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@hc.apache.org
Received: (qmail 40436 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2015 17:38:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@hc.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@hc.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.hc.apache.org>
Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" <dev@hc.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hc.apache.org
Received: (qmail 40421 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2015 17:38:59 -0000
Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:38:59 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org)
 with ESMTP id 213C61AAFA6
	for <dev@hc.apache.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:38:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.9
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
	autolearn=disabled
Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new);
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
	with ESMTP id eQkfrc8kX_md for <dev@hc.apache.org>;
	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:38:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com
 [209.85.215.45])
	by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with
 ESMTPS id CBEC242B5D
	for <dev@hc.apache.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:38:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by laboe4 with SMTP id oe4so11007070lab.0
        for <dev@hc.apache.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=IHIRw9W8B8luRa2IoD5O1iAoifittF5LmvnuunwBfWM=;
        b=Sa09KvFla4DxrugU+f3scFsUEiDPFAKutvMHItzy3AjTiB68JP7bYL8CzjwhUOAIya
         sWpQ4kQuFZmPJoBPN1fbwvpMBuUAB9UmbKJgilZ+ol+xrJWOS2klYH5BfRlfMFk5aQuP
         KSJP1VI3hA6N5gfbYSVSYMLiz3NaxLzsLlJ+AeI505Cnh4+uw+prsOgKnkLVh+Nk+/ma
         j3rRoObRbKqcdiZjdhU6gbg6Ox/RYmC3gRVMk3fmv+cJqSeXfwtp9mUSHabafV5EZSGp
         TyOuUbHd7UZ3Nf30Ogy4Kj4pKTONadOxF2D+IJxa6gj8Nk3wwU2XjIriBXV6JNzBnNTT
         ZXug==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.142.105 with SMTP id rv9mr5292830lbb.11.1440783521329;
 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.126.66 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1440782794.14251.2.camel@apache.org>
References: 
 <CACZkXPy7jZzhCMxJoXwdvX44c_h2UyZp8GXVPgcGPvA5O0ds1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1440782794.14251.2.camel@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:38:41 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CACZkXPw-5Nr8UpoHwRM8Y-+0JmzoZusYegcsrCddPkp9pM8kdg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org.apache.http.HttpMessage<T extends HttpEntity> ?
From: Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
To: HttpComponents Project <dev@hc.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3775cfcbb10051e628d10

--001a11c3775cfcbb10051e628d10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <olegk@apache.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 16:27 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Right now we have:
> >
> > org.apache.http.HttpMessage<T>
> >
> > Do we really want to have any kind of object in there or would this be
> > better:
> >
> > org.apache.http.HttpMessage<T extends HttpEntity>
> >
> > ?
> >
>
> Gary
>
> It was done with HTTP/2 support in mind. Most likely HttpEntity
> interface will no longer work well for HTTP/2 transport. However I would
> still like to have a common message class shared by both HTTP/1.1 and
> HTTP/2 transports.
>

OK, so that sounds like leave it as HttpMessage<T> for now.

Gary


> Oleg
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

--001a11c3775cfcbb10051e628d10--