Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-27368-apmail-hc-dev-archive=hc.apache.org@hc.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B577EB0C
	for <apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:29:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 97486 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2013 09:29:22 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@hc.apache.org
Received: (qmail 97185 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2013 09:29:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@hc.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@hc.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.hc.apache.org>
Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" <dev@hc.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hc.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96982 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2013 09:29:14 -0000
Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:29:14 +0000
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:29:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Josef Johansson (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@hc.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12519958.1314188312894.292394.1360920554724@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12519958.1314188312894@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12519958.1314188312894@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HTTPCLIENT-1119) Server Name Indication (SNI)
 Support
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13579057#comment-13579057 ] 

Josef Johansson commented on HTTPCLIENT-1119:
---------------------------------------------

How much of a TLS implementation is done to this day? How much work does 'writing proper RFC 3546 implementation' imply would you say?

Is it not possible to copy the code in JDK 7 more or less, or is it not license compatible? What is hindering us to do that?

Is someone looking at this at all? If you see missing SNI as a problem, this is huge because every Android mobile today is lacking it because hc does not support it.

- Josef
                
> Server Name Indication (SNI) Support
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-1119
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1119
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HttpClient
>            Reporter: Gus Power
>              Labels: sni, ssl, tls, vhost
>             Fix For: Future
>
>         Attachments: HTTPCLIENT-1119-support-SNI-on-Java-7-via-setHost-of.patch
>
>
> Provide support for Server Name Indication (SNI) support as per RFC 3546 (section 3.1).
> Currently attempting to connect to SNI enabled host 'expectedhost' over SSL using http client results in an SSLException similar to:
> javax.net.ssl.SSLException: hostname in certificate didn't match: <expectedhost> != <defaulthost>
>   at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier.verify(AbstractVerifier.java:220)
> We use SNI on some of our environments and were trying to use httpclient to automatically test host access and availability.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org