Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4CF2D25E for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12910 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2012 17:40:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 12777 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2012 17:40:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 12748 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2012 17:40:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:40:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of daddywri@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.177] (HELO mail-ia0-f177.google.com) (209.85.210.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:39:56 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u21so1152028ial.22 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:39:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=bq2OlSheYW58h0oGbwUGsFi5rVd+eK3d7yqdmChZSe8=; b=boH51EUjjGIOUgNcJ5oVme8mAJAnZ7SCIvfpaE6hpkwneD/16sL8HkTRsbC2VRd9GY s2fIffQ8wVUEGexi3Pj57Xs3KWKO3NicoxQ1pXJSnJUbU7NLooCgQVXCrEM+E+eFyShw Wv6urLfG1KT7VJbHoatE7c8IX+cFsQPFHwtRVl9A8B+ugS2Wm/V6oTNPcOmDjkiEc7AX PQOg6FW3FbliQRyfSUImXCzuVkijvYH0+zaucHc+pjXJ6dGVYWQsWdxeoVbKP9nieEfn yAMFCHf5Toxj9A0ow0YC2va/y5lAR/R7PEcJG1jyjXOYs8JKmIPQiB7a38S7jct3J4mB DoUw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.187.230 with SMTP id fv6mr14083007igc.48.1355333975531; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:39:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.73.7 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:39:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1355332404.9364.7.camel@ubuntu> References: <1355312750.9364.5.camel@ubuntu> <1355332404.9364.7.camel@ubuntu> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:39:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NTLM internal engine vs JCIFS From: Karl Wright To: HttpComponents Project Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I will happily have a go at it, probably Friday or this weekend. Karl On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 07:27 -0500, Karl Wright wrote: >> It may well be the right thing to do. The implementation is certainly >> on par with jCIFS right now. The jCIFS implementer, in fact, has been >> reducing NTLM support in that library to bare minimum over time, >> because he has a for-profit venture to sell his "real" implementation. >> So, for instance, logic having to do with how to interpret flags etc. >> is no longer there. >> >> Karl >> > > Karl, > > Feel free to edit the tutorial as you deem appropriate. > > Oleg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org