Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83F969551 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28238 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2011 15:49:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 28210 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2011 15:49:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 28201 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2011 15:49:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:49:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [92.42.190.144] (HELO ok2cons2.nine.ch) (92.42.190.144) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:49:40 +0000 Received: from [192.168.42.14] (unknown [213.55.131.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ok2cons2.nine.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BC7C245E48F for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:48:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [VOTE] HttpComponents Core 4.2-alpha2 release based on RC1 From: Oleg Kalnichevski To: HttpComponents Project In-Reply-To: References: <1316359544.5216.5.camel@ubuntu> <1316438814.5453.26.camel@ubuntu> <1316440822.5453.38.camel@ubuntu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:48:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1316447320.5453.43.camel@ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 11:39 -0400, Bill Speirs wrote: > Just tried on a Linux box which is used by about 50 - 60 developers and > everything passed. > > Sebb, could you try pulling out a fresh copy from SVN and testing that? > Maybe you have something conflicting that you don't realize? > > Bill- > Tested on WinXP and Ubuntu 10.10. Never had any issues. I did realize, however, there was a (remote) possibility for #connected events not being fired fast enough (which appears to be the case with the Sebastian's system given that the number of open connections in the error message was always below expected 10). I tweaked the test case and fixed possible race condition. Sebastian, Could you please pull the latest snapshot from the trunk and re-try? Oleg > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Bill Speirs wrote: > > > Which OS? > >> > >> I am using WinXP; system not heavily loaded. > >> > > > > I am on a Win7 machine. > > > >> > > Bill- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org