Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59714 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 13:59:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 13:59:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 3987 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 13:59:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 3926 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 13:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 3732 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 13:59:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:59:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:59:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9IDxNfV006323 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:59:23 GMT Message-ID: <30130293.21911287410363639.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:59:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Karl Wright (JIRA)" To: dev@hc.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HTTPCLIENT-919) NTLM implementation lacks support for NTLMv1, NTLMv2, and NTLM2 Session forms of NTLM In-Reply-To: <1150254297.474291266964707926.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922078#action_12922078 ] Karl Wright commented on HTTPCLIENT-919: ---------------------------------------- That's great news! If the authentication architecture is at all similar, it should not take me too long to do this. The logic trickiness is in all the encryption, and perhaps in getting some DC's set up with the proper switches for testing. But I won't be able to start on it for a couple of weeks at best. But by then I am hoping to have procured access to my old testing environment formerly at MetaCarta and now at qBase, so that I can verify the code. If your time frame is too urgent for that, then by all means I urge you to go ahead. > NTLM implementation lacks support for NTLMv1, NTLMv2, and NTLM2 Session forms of NTLM > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HTTPCLIENT-919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-919 > Project: HttpComponents HttpClient > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: HttpAuth > Reporter: Karl Wright > Fix For: 4.1 Alpha3 > > Attachments: ntlmv2-etc.patch > > > The current HttpClient implementation lacks support for all enhancements to NTLM after Windows 95. That includes NTLMv1, NTLMv2, and NTLM2 Session Response varieties of the protocol. > This seriously impacts the usability of HttpClient in enterprise situations, which has required the Lucene Connector Framework team to extend HttpClient to address the issue. > I've attached a patch which contains the implementation used by LCF. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org