Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37608 invoked from network); 16 May 2010 04:46:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 May 2010 04:46:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 99064 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2010 04:46:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 98861 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2010 04:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 98852 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2010 04:46:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 May 2010 04:46:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of supun06@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.180] (HELO mail-qy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.221.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 May 2010 04:46:37 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so4973415qyk.11 for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 21:46:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RzCaOloCS0tO5NFCCejoJ6me3SCu/unc0iRacJY2na8=; b=B67U/SVh1OhSmRa9bsM687HssIm0o9jxcbHe6HCdNiX2AID1Y58ZPMc5ZoeKKt3Wyt 0doWVLMYJxLO+RxN5IG6fwiBp3t/9yWXCcgKu55vBBrp2tykEbEsphbxvobzISNLc2pd wAnjZc0r5lkjvKsP+bZm64rbhPUzXdqOD3bto= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mBALwAn8YIUEwNm1+yH5Pu7AS+um1ldOmJ4jDiIU0nBgId67DCq6K7hZxsRelQgHPO gSGsK7Tbr0u0ZVWTXX/5qXvft9ulPFo8YE7EirDoG2lqnKfebYQiD5F4IqLMbQrpHY1o iNBfpMdk/JCDjIalLXVDHPQP0HffiAlOzTSew= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.222.144 with SMTP id ig16mr786983qcb.74.1273985176452; Sat, 15 May 2010 21:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.100.18 with HTTP; Sat, 15 May 2010 21:46:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1273929594.13330.2.camel@ubuntu> References: <1273921125.31376.18.camel@ubuntu> <1273929594.13330.2.camel@ubuntu> Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 10:16:16 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: I/O Dispatcher thread blocks on a read From: Supun Kamburugamuva To: HttpComponents Project Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016362835e0e43d7b0486aec98f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016362835e0e43d7b0486aec98f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Oleg, A quick question. In this system we have two IO dispatchers. Only one dispatcher is blocked. But all the workers are waiting on a lock unlocked by the dispatchers. If one dispatcher is blocked, what happen to the other dispatcher? Is it going to work normally? Thanks, Supun.. On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 18:28 +0530, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote: > > Hi Oleg, > > > > There is an exception in the listening side of the transport. Do you > think > > this is the cause of the error? > > > > Thanks, > > Supun.. > > > > Most likely it is. The real problem is, however, that the producer > thread failed to shut down the shared buffer, thus leaving the consumer > thread stuck unaware of the error condition. > > Hope this helps > > Oleg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org > > -- Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc http://wso2.org supunk.blogspot.com --0016362835e0e43d7b0486aec98f--