Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69624 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2008 13:56:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2008 13:56:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 3803 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2008 13:56:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hc-dev-archive@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 3779 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2008 13:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hc.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hc.apache.org Received: (qmail 3768 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2008 13:56:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:56:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:55:06 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C09234C177 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <389791171.1216821331944.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:55:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Oleg Kalnichevski (JIRA)" To: dev@hc.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HTTPCLIENT-788) Public Suffix List In-Reply-To: <2133829763.1216655131703.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-788?page=3Dcom.atlas= sian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D= 12616021#action_12616021 ]=20 Oleg Kalnichevski commented on HTTPCLIENT-788: ---------------------------------------------- Odi The patch looks good to me. There is one issue, though. In its current form= the patch introduces dependency on HttpCore SNAPSHOT, which means we would= have to release HttpCore 4.0 beta3 before we could release the next versio= n of HttpClient. Can this patch be committed after the HttpClient release? = Alternatively would it be acceptable for you to move the IDN conversion cod= e to HttpClient? Oleg > Public Suffix List > ------------------ > > Key: HTTPCLIENT-788 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-788 > Project: HttpComponents HttpClient > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: HttpCookie > Reporter: Ortwin Gl=C3=BCck > Priority: Minor > Attachments: patch.txt > > > Hi, > I just found this useful list: http://publicsuffix.org/ > and thought it would be nice to validate cookie domains against it, basic= ally serving as a black list of domain for which never to set any cookies. = What do you think about the attached patch? The download/parsing of the lis= t is of course not part of the implementation. > Ortwin --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org