Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-httpcomponents-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66015 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2007 17:59:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2007 17:59:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 66952 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2007 17:59:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-httpcomponents-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 66925 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2007 17:59:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpcomponents-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" Delivered-To: mailing list httpcomponents-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 66916 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2007 17:59:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 09:59:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.126.171] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:59:34 +0000 Received: from [85.180.26.54] (e180026054.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.26.54]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML25U-1J13xK0J5F-0004Uz; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:59:14 +0100 Message-ID: <475ADBC8.6040305@dubioso.net> Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:00:40 +0100 From: Roland Weber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071204 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HttpComponents Project Subject: [HttpConn] playing with generics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18374NP/TnLPH16j6QFAZiNf5K2exaWuUvSHj8 GrCvk9tAAeLe0qXgQPFuYqw1KXPczl5/MsoVBMX29RZrgBwVw7 5api1MnMgDWGB6jTPSCVgnMJuQ1JbfR X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi folks, I've been playing with Java 5 generics in HttpConn. It seems that as soon as I use generics anywhere, I get warnings all over the place for not using them elsewhere in the same compilation unit. Is that observation correct? Should I wait with checking in generics patches until we have the cycles available to sort it out in HttpCookie, HttpAuth and HttpClient as well? Or is it time to discuss modularization into separate compilation units? cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpcomponents-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: httpcomponents-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org