Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-httpcomponents-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83906 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2007 11:20:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2007 11:20:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 95537 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2007 11:20:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-httpcomponents-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 95338 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2007 11:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpcomponents-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "HttpComponents Project" Delivered-To: mailing list httpcomponents-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 95329 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2007 11:20:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:20:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.46.255.15] (HELO viefep25-int.chello.at) (213.46.255.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:20:07 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (really [84.75.119.175]) by viefep25-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070428111944.PDCK17727.viefep25-int.chello.at@[192.168.1.102]> for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:19:44 +0200 Subject: [HttpClient] 4.0 release planning was Re: [HttpClient et al] tidbits From: Oleg Kalnichevski To: HttpComponents Project In-Reply-To: <46332699.90101@dubioso.net> References: <462B1DAB.7080003@dubioso.net> <1177318113.5761.23.camel@okhost> <46332699.90101@dubioso.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:19:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1177759183.11761.25.camel@okhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 12:48 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > >> HttpState: > >> We've talked about that during the High Level Design. > >> It's good enough for alpha1, but should be split into > >> it's different aspects afterwards. > > > > I do think it is _really_ important to get ALPHA1 release out rather > > sooner then later. Port of HttpClient to HttpCore is a massive change by > > itself and is intended to address the most severe architectural issues > > with HttpClient. HttpState is somewhat ugly but not utterly broken the > > same way HttpMethod / HttpMethodBase are. Therefore I would rather have > > more test cases ported from 3.1 to 4.0 API and get the new framework > > reasonably tested and stable and only then get down to fixing > > non-critical aspects such as the HTTP state management API. > > Agreed. > > > What remains to be done for ALPHA1 in HttpConn? > > Use of HttpParams and test coverage, as far as I remember. > The gaping holes I left were in HttpClient. Fixing those > might of course expose omissions in the HttpConn API. > > cheers, > Roland > Hi Roland, I am currently working on a reverse proxy example based on HttpCore NIO. Once it is done I could put HttpCore on the back burner for a while and turn my attention to HttpClient. Would you have any spare cycles for HttpComponents in May? Cheers, Oleg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpcomponents-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: httpcomponents-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpcomponents-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: httpcomponents-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org