hc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julius Davies (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HTTPCLIENT-614) allow different strategies when checking CN of x509 cert
Date Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:28:22 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-614?page=all ]

Julius Davies updated HTTPCLIENT-614:

    Attachment: ssl-even-better.patch

- No more japanese characters directly in the source files.  Using "\u82b1\u5b50" instead.
 These japanese hostname tests are probably silly (will never occur in real life thanks to
""xn--i8s592g.co.jp" puny encoding.  But they're fun.  :-)

Oleg, can we commit this version, and then look into a factory approach?

> allow different strategies when checking CN of x509 cert
> --------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-614
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-614
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HttpConn
>    Affects Versions: Nightly Builds
>            Reporter: Julius Davies
>             Fix For: 4.0 Alpha 1
>         Attachments: ssl-better.patch, ssl-even-better.patch, ssl.patch
> We're now doing a decent job for checking the CN of the x509 cert with https:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-613
> I think the patch for HTTPCLIENT-613 should cover 99.9% of the users out there.  But
there are some more esoteric possibilities, so I think Oleg is right.  We need to let the
user change the strategy, or provide their own strategy if they want to. 
> Some additional things to think about:
> - http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/VhostTaskForce !!!   CN is depreciated?!?!   (I am not
able to find a popular website on HTTPS that isn't using CN!)
> - [*.example.com] matches subdomains [a.b.example.com] on Firefox, but not IE6.  The
patch for HTTPCLIENT-613 allows subdomains.
> - Should we support multiple CN's in the subject?
> - Should we support "subjectAltName=DNS:www.example.com" ?  Should we support lots of
them in a single cert?
> - Should we support a mix of CN and subjectAltName?
> If we do create some alternate strategies for people to try, I'd probably lean towards
something like this:
> X509NameCheckingStrategy.SUN_JAVA_6  (default)
> X509NameCheckingStrategy.FIREFOX2
> X509NameCheckingStrategy.IE7
> X509NameCheckingStrategy.FIRST_CN_AND_NO_WILDCARDS   (aka "STRICT")

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpcomponents-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: httpcomponents-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

View raw message