Mailing-List: contact httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "HttpClient Project" <httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44129770.1040006@dubioso.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:25:04 +0100
From: Roland Weber <http-async@dubioso.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051110
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HttpClient Project <httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Bugzilla vs Jira revisited
References: <1141997581.4098.81.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1141997581.4098.81.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Oleg,

since I'm missing first-hand experience with JIRA, I searched
a little on the web. The direct comparisons seem to be rather
in favor of JIRA.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.software.testing/browse_thread/thread/44fcaa771838eb5d/47a4b78f841d27a0?lnk=st&q=bugzilla+jira+-httpclient&rnum=9&hl=en#47a4b78f841d27a0
http://marc2.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=112667428311853&w=2

I've also browsed through the xml-cocoon-dev list of last
September to November. Migrating a bugzilla database to JIRA
is quite some effort. But since you're not suggesting to
migrate HttpClient, except maybe the handful of bugs opened
for or assigned to 4.0, I guess we'd be fine with JIRA. The
distinction between HttpClient and HttpComponents should
be clear enough to not confuse users.

cheers,
  Roland

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org