Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-httpclient-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73531 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2005 09:26:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2005 09:26:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 79022 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2005 09:26:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-httpclient-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 78993 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2005 09:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "HttpClient Project" Reply-To: "HttpClient Project" Delivered-To: mailing list httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 78982 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2005 09:26:12 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 02:26:11 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 8CEDB21E; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:25:50 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36918] - Digest auth uses wrong uri in proxy authentication X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20051005092550.8CEDB21E@ajax.apache.org> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:25:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36918 ------- Additional Comments From olegk@apache.org 2005-10-05 11:25 ------- (In reply to comment #4) ... > Oleg, > See below for similar headers for a non-SSL connection. It's like "/stuff" > though I'm not sure if that is strictly RFC compliant or not. Tommorrow I'll > try a few variations and see if anything interesting happens. > So, the situation is far from being simple. There's no consistency in how various HTTP agents and servers handle the digest-uri. I re-read the RFC and this did not make things any clearer for me. There are ways of seeing and not seeing, depending on what one wants or does not want to see. Hence, the inconsistency in implementations I suggest the following: (1) For release 3.0 we basically do nothing because we simply can't work around the problem without unfreezing the API (2) For release 3.1 we can fix the problem for CONNECT methods. This can be done without breaking the 3.x API comatibility (3) We revisit the problem in the course of 4.0 development and try to come up with a proper fix for the problem Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org