hc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33988] - Cookie.java hashCode method violates contract
Date Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:37:15 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33988>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33988





------- Additional Comments From chiao@chiaocheng.com  2005-03-14 20:37 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> > Why access member variable directly with that.cookieDomain instead of using
> > accessor methods getDomain()?  
> What would be benefits of doing otherwise?
> > Does current object have access to that.cookieDomain?  
> Yes, it does, because "that" is an instance of the same class

Cool.  No benefit I guess.  I was just curious and wanted to know for my self-
education.  Thanks for the answers!


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message