Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-httpclient-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92424 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2004 13:53:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2004 13:53:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 90290 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2004 13:53:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-httpclient-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 90266 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2004 13:53:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "HttpClient Project" Reply-To: "HttpClient Project" Delivered-To: mailing list httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 90253 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2004 13:53:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate2.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:53:09 -0800 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate2.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB8Dr5bP213462 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:53:05 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id iB8DrIOb121858 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:53:18 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB8Dr4QY007348 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:53:05 +0100 Received: from d12ml067.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12ml067.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.164.162]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB8Dr4k4007342 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:53:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <41B701A0.3050102@nose.ch> To: "HttpClient Project" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Issue With HttpClient Session Handling X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0 September 26, 2002 From: Roland Weber X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Roland Weber/Germany/IBM(Release 6.0|September 26, 2002) at 08.12.2004 14:51:49, Serialize by Notes Client on Roland Weber/Germany/IBM(Release 6.0|September 26, 2002) at 08.12.2004 14:51:49, Serialize complete at 08.12.2004 14:51:49, S/MIME Sign failed at 08.12.2004 14:51:49: The cryptographic key was not found, Serialize by Router on D12ML067/12/M/IBM(Release 6.51HF338 | June 21, 2004) at 08/12/2004 14:53:17, Serialize complete at 08/12/2004 14:53:17 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:53:16 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 004C27C1C1256F64_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --=_alternative 004C27C1C1256F64_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ortwin Gl=FCck wrote on 08.12.2004 14:29:04: > [...] > Please keep in mind: HTTP can NOT (no, never ever) be proxied=20 transparently. > [...] > In a web-browsing cenario the=20 > proxy must rewrite the content(!) of the transferred content, such that=20 > the client is fooled correctly. > [...] > It is a very complex and error-prone task. > [...] I fully agree. I have to maintain a reverse proxy servlet that does exactly what you described. It can only work reliably with the cooperation of the server applications that are proxied. cheers, Roland --=_alternative 004C27C1C1256F64_=--