Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-httpclient-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32965 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2004 12:23:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2004 12:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 10588 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2004 12:23:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-httpclient-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10551 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2004 12:23:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Commons HttpClient Project" Reply-To: "Commons HttpClient Project" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10538 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2004 12:23:45 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [140.142.33.4] (HELO mxout2.cac.washington.edu) (140.142.33.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 05:23:44 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i82CNgH2010340 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:23:42 -0700 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pool-141-149-173-185.bos.east.verizon.net [141.149.173.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i82CNecL017527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:23:42 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20040902064638.8158.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> References: <20040902064638.8158.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Becke Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21329] - Add InputStream buffering. Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:23:35 -0400 To: "Commons HttpClient Project" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Roland, Yes, that was definitely part of the discussion, and this seems to be a pretty good solution for that. Now that I've slept on it , I think this also came up when were originally discussing isStale() and how to determine if a connection is still valid. Does buffering at this level cause problems here? My gut reaction is that is that is could, but probably won't under most conditions. My feeling is that there shouldn't be anything buffered between requests. Does anyone have a good real-world test case for this? Mike On Sep 2, 2004, at 2:46 AM, bugzilla@apache.org wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > . > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21329 > > Add InputStream buffering. > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From rolweber@de.ibm.com 2004-09-02 06:46 > ------- > Hi Mike, > > the discussion usually centered around buffering for the response body. > Since folks could just get the input stream and create their own > buffered > stream on top, there didn't seem to be a need to create a buffered > stream > within Http Client. (That's what I recall, I didn't check the > archives.) > > cheers, > Roland > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: > commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org